Menu
2025 Session

Budget Amendments - HB1600 (Member Request)

View Budget Item
View Budget Item amendments

Chief Patron: Sickles
Modify Nursing Facility Value-Based Payments from Lump Sum to Prospective Rate Add-On (language only)

Item 288 #21h

Item 288 #21h

Health and Human Resources
Department of Medical Assistance Services

Language

Page 386, after line 25, insert:
"e. The department shall modify the value-based payment (VBP) program to move the metric-based payment from an annual retrospective lump sum payment arrangement to an annual prospective rate add-on arrangement. Specifically, the department shall annually utilize the most recently completed performance measurement period to establish an aggregate facility-specific per patient day (PPD) amount across all metrics. This single facility specific PPD shall be the basis of a rate add-on for each facility's fiscal year Medicaid rate immediately following each annual performance measurement period; this PPD add-on shall not be case mix adjusted. Fiscal year 2026 rates, effective July 1, 2025, shall be the first rates utilizing this new approach, based on the VBP performance period ending September 30, 2024. The department shall work with stakeholders to determine a methodology designed to ensure that the annual appropriation to the VBP program is not materially under- or over-spent because of this modification in the payment arrangement. Nothing in this modification changes the requirement for payment of fiscal year 2025 amounts under the current lump sum arrangement according to the existing schedule. The department shall implement the necessary regulatory changes and other necessary measures to be consistent with federal approval of any appropriate changes to the State Plan or relevant waivers thereof, and prior to the completion of any regulatory process undertaken to effect such change."



Explanation

(This amendment modifies language related to the nursing facility value-based payments. This change would utilize the same performance cycle, but, after a transition year, would shift from making the value-based payment with a 7 to 10-month lag to an on-going, real-time payment associated with when facilities submit claims. This would be accomplished as a VBP per day amount, based on the same performance results, but which would be included in the rate paid through the normal claims process in each rate year that immediately follows each performance year. While the program is well-received and effective, the lump sum approach does not address the fact that many of the initiatives undertaken to address quality concerns, such as staff augmentation, are ongoing daily costs. As lump sums received long after the fact, day-to-day operations are stressed to maintain the initiatives without the additional reimbursement as the costs are incurred. Additionally, lenders are not willing to provide credit based on potential future “bonuses” that are unknown in amounts, and budgeting is much more difficult given the uncertainty of the retroactive lump sum VBP payment approach. For many providers using accrual accounting principles, they also end up paying taxes on an “expected” amount of VBP revenue before they have even received the revenue, further stressing their finances to maintain the initiatives while awaiting the potential payout each year. Additionally, the lump sum approach has caused additional administrative costs for the five Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs), and likely for the fee-for-service contractor as well. The lump sums are administered as a separate payment process by each of the participating MCOs, and the costs of that undertaking are reflected in the costs of the per member per month payments made under the Cardinal Care contract. By switching to a claims-based approach, it simplifies the task for the MCOs as they are simply paying claims as they are submitted, with VBP being a virtually invisible part of that as far as the MCO process is concerned.)