Menu
2012 Session

Budget Amendments - HB30 (Committee Approved)

View Budget Item
View Budget Item amendments

Medicaid Provider Appeals Procedure (language only)

Item 307 #18h

Item 307 #18h

Health And Human Resources
Medical Assistance Services, Department of

Language
Page 238, strike lines 28 through 30 and insert:
"iii.  Eliminate an automatic dismissal against DMAS for alleged deficiencies in the case summary that do not relate to DMAS’s obligation to substantively address all issues specified in the provider’s written notice of informal appeal.  A process shall be added, by which the provider shall file with the informal appeals agent within 12 calendar days of the provider’s receipt of the DMAS case summary, a written notice that specifies any such alleged deficiencies that the provider knows or reasonably should know exist.  DMAS shall have 12 calendar days after receipt of the provider’s timely written notification to address or cure any of said alleged deficiencies.  The current requirement that the case summary address each adjustment, patient, service date, or other disputed matter identified in the provider’s written notice of informal appeal in the detail set forth in the current regulation shall remain in force and effect, and failure to file a written case summary with the Appeals Division in the detail specified within 30 days of the filing of the provider's written notice of informal appeal shall result in dismissal in favor of the provider on those issues not addressed by DMAS."


Explanation
(This amendment replaces one subsection of the proposed language in the Department of Medical Assistance Services which changes the process and procedures related to provider appeals. The proposed language would have eliminated an automatic default against the agency for deficiencies in the case summary for an informal appeal and replaced it with an unspecified process for a provider to object to the case summary and the agency to correct it. Language in this amendment (1) eliminates the automatic default against the agency for non-substantive deficiencies in the case summary, (2) specifies a process in which providers shall notify the agency of alleged non-substantive deficiencies in the case summary, and (3) provides the agency the opportunity to address or correct the alleged deficiencies. Language clarifies that there is no change in the other substantive requirements related to issues addressed in the case summary.)