Menu
2026 Session

Budget Amendments - SB30 (Committee Approved)

View Budget Item
View Budget Item amendments

Defer Videoconference Funding

Item 31 #2s

Item 31 #2s

First Year - FY2027 Second Year - FY2028
Judicial Department
Supreme Court FY2027 ($1,107,964) FY2028 ($2,263,141) GF

Language
Page 30, line 45, strike "$64,548,646" and insert "$63,440,682".
Page 30, line 45, strike "$66,096,455" and insert "$63,833,314".

Page 33, after line 27, insert:

"U. The Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court shall assess the cost and feasibility of providing infrastructure for remote proceedings in every district and circuit court in the Commonwealth and requiring judges to offer remote hearings in any motion, if both parties agree to the remote hearing. The assessment shall include: (i) the current capability for remote proceedings in each courtroom, including which types of court proceedings the remote proceedings support; (ii) the sources of funding that support the current infrastructure; (iii) recent amounts collected by circuit and district court clerks through local costs, fines, and fees that are not deposited into the state general fund, including a summary of the eligible uses for such collections; and (iv) the cost of providing infrastructure to support access to remote hearings for motions, arraignments, and other matters in each courtroom in the Commonwealth. The Office of the Executive Secretary shall provide the results of the assessment to the Chairs of the House Appropriations Committee and Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee no later than November 15, 2026."



Explanation

(This amendment removes $1.1 million GF the first year and $2.3 million GF the second year proposed in the introduced budget to replace videoconferencing units in courtrooms and directs the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court to conduct a comprehensive study that examines the existing infrastructure for remote hearings in the Commonwealth, funding sources available to cover such infrastructure, and the cost and feasibility of providing and requiring remote hearing for all motions, with the agreement of both parties.)