Menu
2014 Special Session I

Budget Bill - HB5001 (Introduced)

Direct Aid to Public Education

Item 139

Item 139

First Year - FY2013Second Year - FY2014
State Education Assistance Programs (17800)$5,805,208,720$5,932,601,606
$5,909,550,492
Standards of Quality for Public Education (SOQ) (17801)
Standards of Quality for Public Education (Soq) (17801)
FY2013 $5,178,177,305FY2014 $5,261,418,866
$5,199,078,786
Financial Incentive Programs for Public Education (17802)FY2013 $72,087,786FY2014 $150,861,610
$137,851,224
Financial Assistance for Categorical Programs (17803)FY2013 $55,483,629FY2014 $58,321,130
$55,420,482
Distribution of Lottery Funds (17805)FY2013 $499,460,000FY2014 $462,000,000
$517,200,000
Fund Sources:  
GeneralFY2013 $5,162,194,292FY2014 $5,331,142,893
$5,228,943,919
SpecialFY2013 $895,000FY2014 $895,000
Commonwealth TransportationFY2013 $2,173,000FY2014 $2,173,000
Trust and AgencyFY2013 $639,946,428FY2014 $598,390,713
$677,538,573

Authority: Standards of Quality for Public Education (SOQ) (17801): Article VIII, Section 2, Constitution of Virginia; Chapter 667, Acts of Assembly, 1980; §§ 22.1-176 through 22.1-198, 22.1-199.1, 22.1-199.2, 22.1-213 through 22.1-221, 22.1-227 through 22.1-237, 22.1-253.13:1 through 22.1-253.13:8, 22.1-254.01, Code of Virginia; Title 51.1, Chapters 1, 5, 6.2, 7, and 14, Code of Virginia; P.L. 91-230, as amended; P.L. 93-380, as amended; P.L. 94-142, as amended; P.L. 98-524, as amended, Federal Code.


Financial Incentive Programs for Public Education (17802): §§ 22.1-24, 22.1-289.1 through 22.1-318, Code of Virginia; P.L. 79-396, as amended; P.L. 89-10, as amended; P.L. 89-642, as amended; P.L. 108-265, as amended; Title II P.L. 99-159, as amended, Federal Code.


Financial Assistance for Categorical Programs (17803): Discretionary Inclusion; Treaty of 1677 between Virginia and the Indians; §§ 22.1-3.4, 22.1-101, 22.1-108, 22.1-199 through 22.1-212.2:3, 22.1-213 through 22.1-221, 22.1-223 through 22.1-237, 22.1-254, Code of Virginia; P.L. 89-10, as amended; P.L. 91-230, as amended; P.L. 93-380, as amended; P.L. 94-142, as amended; P.L. 94-588; P.L. 95-561, as amended; P.L. 98-211, as amended; P.L. 98-524, as amended; P.L. 99-570; P.L. 100-297, as amended; P.L. 102-73, as amended; P.L. 105-220, as amended, Federal Code.


Distribution of Lottery Funds (17805): §§ 58.1-4022 and 58.1-4022.1, Code of Virginia


Appropriation Detail of Education Assistance Programs (17800)

 

 

 

 

 

Standards of Quality (17801)

FY 2013

FY 2014

Basic Aid

$2,922,926,071

$2,898,507,568

 

 

$2,926,926,187

Sales Tax

$1,211,600,000

$1,257,500,000

 

 

$1,219,700,000

Textbooks

$0

$45,846,044

 

 

$0

Vocational Education

$53,785,080

$53,823,405

 

 

$53,873,016

Gifted Education

$32,083,080

$32,245,796

 

 

$32,299,221

Special Education

$362,234,349

$366,787,264

 

 

$367,217,196

Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation

$85,106,596

$85,280,308

 

 

$85,370,938

Remedial Summer School (split funded)

$15,329,431

$23,435,017

 

 

$0

VRS Retirement (includes RHCC)

$302,492,718

$304,272,866

 

 

$304,754,993

Social Security

$181,217,441

$182,252,781

 

 

$182,538,742

Group Life

$11,402,539

$11,467,817

 

 

$11,486,365

Total

$5,178,177,305

$5,261,418,866

 

 

$5,184,166,658

Incentive Programs (17802)

 

 

Governor's School

$14,382,635

$14,958,873

 

 

$14,626,609

Governor's School Planning and Startup/ Expansion Grants

$100,000

$100,000

Governor's School Planning Grant - Hampton Roads Site

$100,000

$0

Clinical Faculty

$318,750

$318,750

Career Switcher Mentoring Grants

$279,983

$279,983

Special Education Endorsement Program

$600,000

$600,000

Special Education - Vocational Education

$200,089

$200,089

Virginia Workplace Readiness Skills Assessment

$308,655

$308,655

EpiPen Grants

$200,000

$0

Additional Assistance with Retirement, Inflation and Preschool Costs (split funded)

$55,000,000

$55,000,000

 

 

$51,212,111

Performance Pay Incentive

$597,673

$0

Compensation Supplement

$0

$70,164,391

 

 

$60,963,418

Early Reading Specialists Initiative

$0

$1,430,868

 

 

$956,068

Strategic Compensation Grants Initiative

$0

$7,500,000

 

 

$4,497,651

Total

$72,087,785

$150,861,609

 

 

$134,063,335

Categorical Programs (17803)

 

 

Adult Education

$1,051,800

$1,051,800

Adult Literacy

$2,480,000

$2,480,000

Virtual Virginia

$4,347,808

$4,347,808

American Indian Treaty Commitment

$61,531

$63,446

 

 

$45,094

School Lunch Program

$5,801,932

$5,801,932

Special Education - Homebound

$5,224,513

$5,605,452

 

 

$5,372,903

Special Education – Jails

$3,544,117

$3,815,919

 

 

$3,414,375

Special Education – State Operated Programs

$32,971,928

$35,154,773

 

 

$32,906,570

Total

$55,483,629

$58,321,130

 

 

$55,420,482

 

 

 

Lottery (17805)

 

 

Foster Care

$9,016,406

$9,413,338

 

$78,734,853

$8,962,411

At-Risk Add-On

 

$78,626,984

 

 

$78,687,071

Virginia Preschool Initiative

$64,953,097

$68,569,714

 

 

$67,424,295

Early Reading Intervention

$15,332,606

$14,972,241

 

 

$17,482,065

Mentor Teacher

$1,000,000

$1,000,000

K-3 Primary Class Size Reduction

$102,671,654

$106,431,479

 

 

$103,971,881

School Breakfast Program

$3,693,543

$3,837,586

 

 

$3,612,556

SOL Algebra Readiness

$11,173,155

$11,352,196

 

 

$11,394,145

Regional Alternative Education

$7,802,104

$8,061,000

 

 

$8,048,710

ISAEP

$2,247,581

$2,247,581

Special Education – Regional Tuition

$72,429,258

$77,703,941

 

 

$77,774,168

Career and Technical Education – Categorical

$10,400,829

$10,400,829

Project Graduation

$2,774,478

$2,774,478

Virginia Teacher Corps (NCLB/EFAL)

$415,000

$415,000

Race to GED (NCLB/EFAL)

$2,485,988

$2,410,988

Path to Industry Certification (NCLB/EFAL)

$1,065,133

$1,331,464

Supplemental Basic Aid

$892,395

$878,076

 

 

$903,152

English as a Second Language

$44,675,649

$45,863,224

 

 

$45,258,661

Textbooks (split funded)

$61,262,666

$15,709,881

 

 

$61,660,423

Remedial Summer School (split funded)

$6,433,605

$0

 

 

$23,152,232

Additional Assistance with Retirement, Inflation and Preschool Costs (split funded)

$0

$3,787,889

Total

$499,460,000

$462,000,000

 

 

$532,700,000

Technology – VPSA

$59,846,000

$59,612,000

 

 

$64,316,100

Security Equipment – VPSA

 

$6,000,000


 


Payments out of the above amounts shall be subject to the following conditions:


A.  Definitions


1. "March 31 Average Daily Membership," or "March 31 ADM" - The responsible school division's average daily membership for grades K-12 including (1) handicapped students ages 5-21 and (2) students for whom English is a second language who entered school for the first time after reaching their twelfth birthday, and who have not reached twenty-two years of age on or before August 1 of the school year, for the first seven (7) months (or equivalent period) of the school year through March 31 in which state funds are distributed from this appropriation. Preschool and postgraduate students shall not be included in March 31 ADM.


a. School divisions shall take a count of September 30 fall membership and report this information to the Department of Education no later than October 15 of each year.


b. Except as otherwise provided herein, by statute, or by precedent, all appropriations to the Department of Education shall be calculated using March 31 ADM unadjusted for half-day kindergarten programs, estimated at 1,221,485.85 the first year and 1,228,510.35 1,230,128.95 the second year.


c. March 31 ADM adjusted for half-day kindergarten at 85 percent of March 31 ADM, is estimated at 1,220,774.28 the first yearand 1,227,769.61 the second year.


d. Students who are either (i) enrolled in a nonpublic school or (ii) receiving home instruction pursuant to § 22.1-254.1 and who are enrolled in a public school on less than a full-time basis in any mathematics, science, English, history, social science, vocational education, health education or physical education, fine arts or foreign language course, or receiving special education services required by a student's individualized education plan, shall be counted in the funded fall membership and March 31 ADM of the responsible school division. Each course shall be counted as 0.25, up to a cap of 0.5 of a student.


e. Students enrolled in an Individualized Student Alternative Education Program (ISAEP) pursuant to § 22.1-254 D shall be counted in the March 31 Average Daily Membership of the responsible school division.  School divisions shall report these students separately in their March 31 reports of Average Daily Membership.


2. "Standards of Quality" - Operations standards for grades kindergarten through 12 as prescribed by the Board of Education subject to revision by the General Assembly.


3.a. "Basic Operation Cost" - The cost per pupil, including provision for the number of instructional personnel required by the Standards of Quality for each school division with a minimum ratio of 51 professional personnel for each 1,000 pupils or proportionate number thereof, in March 31 ADM for the same fiscal year for which the costs are computed, and including provision for driver, gifted, occupational-vocational, and special education, library materials and other teaching materials, teacher sick leave, general administration, division superintendents' salaries, free textbooks (including those for free and reduced price lunch pupils), school nurses, operation and maintenance of school plant, transportation of pupils, instructional television, professional and staff improvement, remedial work, fixed charges and other costs in programs not funded by other state and/or federal aid.


b. The state and local shares of funding resulting from the support cost calculation for school nurses shall be specifically identified as such and reported to school divisions annually.  School divisions may spend these funds for licensed school nurse positions employed by the school division or for licensed nurses contracted by the local school division to provide school health services.


4.a. "Composite Index of Local Ability-to-Pay" - An index figure computed for each locality. The composite index is the sum of 2/3 of the index of wealth per pupil in unadjusted March 31 ADM reported for the first seven (7) months of the 2009-2010 school year and 1/3 of the index of wealth per capita (population estimates for 2009 as determined by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service of the University of Virginia) multiplied by the local nominal share of the costs of the Standards of Quality of 0.45 in each year.  The indices of wealth are determined by combining the following constituent index elements with the indicated weighting: (1) true values of real estate and public service corporations as reported by the State Department of Taxation for the calendar year 2009 - 50 percent; (2) adjusted gross income for the calendar year 2009 as reported by the State Department of Taxation - 40 percent; (3) the sales for the calendar year 2009 which are subject to the state general sales and use tax, as reported by the State Department of Taxation - 10 percent. Each constituent index element for a locality is its sum per March 31 ADM, or per capita, expressed as a percentage of the state average per March 31 ADM, or per capita, for the same element.  A locality whose composite index exceeds 0.8000 shall be considered as having an index of 0.8000 for purposes of distributing all payments based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.  Each constituent index element for a locality used to determine the composite index of local ability-to-pay for the current biennium shall be the latest available data for the specified official base year provided to the Department of Education by the responsible source agencies no later than November 15, 2011.


b. For any locality whose total calendar year 2009 Virginia Adjusted Gross Income is comprised of at least 3 percent or more by nonresidents of Virginia, such nonresident income shall be excluded in computing the composite index of ability-to-pay.  The Department of Education shall compute the composite index for such localities by using adjusted gross income data which exclude nonresident income, but shall not adjust the composite index of any other localities.  The Department of Taxation shall furnish to the Department of Education such data as are necessary to implement this provision.


c.1) In the event that two or more school divisions become one school division, whether by consolidation of only the school divisions or by consolidation of the local governments, which shall include the transition of a city to town status, all state payments from this item adjusted by the composite index of local ability to pay to such resulting division or interest rates on approved Literary Fund loans shall be made on the basis of a composite index established by the Board of Education, which shall equal the composite index no lower than the lowest nor higher than the highest composite index of any of the individual school divisions involved in such consolidation.  In addition, the local share of state payments adjusted by the composite index shall also be based on the same composite index of any of the individual school divisions involved in such consolidation.  This index shall remain in effect for a period of no less than five nor more than fifteen years, unless a lower composite index is calculated for the combined division through the process for computing an index figure as set forth above.  The Governor shall approve the composite index determined by the Board of Education prior to disbursement of funds under such index.  The department shall report to the Chairmen of the House Appropriations and Senate Finance Committees the composite indices approved by the Governor and the board in the event this provision is implemented.


2) In the case of the consolidation of Clifton Forge and Alleghany County school divisions, the fifteen year period for the application of a new composite index shall apply beginning with the fiscal year that starts on July 1, 2004.  Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph c.1) the composite index established by the Board of Education shall equal the lowest composite index that was in effect prior to July 1, 2004, of any individual localities involved in such consolidation, and this index shall remain in effect for a period of fifteen years, unless a lower composite index is calculated for the combined division through the process for computing an index as set forth above.


3) Pursuant to paragraph c.1) above, if the composite index of a consolidated school division is reduced during the course of the fifteen year period to a level that would entitle the school division to a lower interest rate for a Literary Fund loan than it received when the loan was originally released, the Board of Education shall reduce the interest rate of such loan for the remainder of the period of the loan.  Such reduction shall be based on the interest rate that would apply at the time of such adjustment.  This rate shall remain in effect for the duration of the loan and shall apply only to those years remaining to be paid.


4) In the case of the consolidation of Bedford County and Bedford City school divisions, the fifteen year period for the application of a new composite shall apply beginning with the fiscal year that starts on July 1, 2013.  Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph c.1) the composite index established by the Board of Education shall equal the lowest composite index that was in effect prior to July 1, 2013, of any individual localities involved in such consolidation, and this index shall remain in effect for a period of fifteen years, unless a lower composite index is calculated for the combined division through the process for computing an index as set forth above.


5) Bedford County Public Schools shall undergo a School Efficiency Review pursuant to Item 271, 4.a.  Such review shall include division administration; human resources; finance; purchasing; educational service delivery costs, including school size; special education; facilities; transportation; technology management; and food service.


6) JLARC is hereby directed, with assistance from the Commission on Local Government, to analyze and make recommendations going forward regarding the most effective balance between the costs of incentives for government and school consolidations with the expected resulting savings and operational benefits, and how best to structure such state incentives to achieve both clarity for localities as well as justification that incentives are adequate, but not more than necessary.  JLARC shall complete its study and submit a final report no later than October 1, 2014.


d. When it is determined that a substantial error exists in a constituent index element, the Department of Education will make adjustments in funding for the current school year only in the division where the error occurred.  The composite index of any other locality shall not be changed as a result of the adjustment.  No adjustment during the biennium will be made as a result of updating of data used in a constituent index element.


e. In the event that any school division consolidates two or more small schools, the division shall continue to receive Standards of Quality funding and provide for the required local expenditure for a period of five years as if the schools had not been consolidated.  Small schools are defined as any elementary, middle, or high school with enrollment below 200, 300 and 400 students, respectively.


5. "Required Local Expenditure for the Standards of Quality" - The locality's share based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay of the cost required by all the Standards of Quality minus its estimated revenues from the state sales and use tax dedicated to public education and those sales tax revenues transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund and appropriated in this Item, both of which are returned on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, as specified in paragraph B.20. of this Item, collected by the Department of Education and distributed to school divisions in the fiscal year in which the school year begins.


6. "Required Local Match" - The locality's required share of program cost based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay for all Lottery and Incentive programs, where required, in which the school division has elected to participate in a fiscal year.


7. "Planning District Eight" - The nine localities which comprise Planning District Eight are Arlington County, Fairfax County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Alexandria City, Fairfax City, Falls Church City, Manassas City, and Manassas Park City.


8. "State Share of the Standards of Quality" - The state share of the Standards of Quality (SOQ) shall be equal to the total funded SOQ cost for a school division less the school division's estimated revenues from the state sales and use tax dedicated to public education based on the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service paragraph B. 20. of this Item, adjusted for the state's share of the composite index of local ability to pay.


9. In the event that the general fund appropriations in this item are not sufficient to meet the entitlements payable to school divisions pursuant to the provisions of this Item, the Department of Education is authorized to transfer any available general fund funds between these Items to address such insufficiencies.  If the total general fund appropriations after such transfers remain insufficient to meet the entitlements of any program funded with general fund dollars, the Department of Education is authorized to prorate such shortfall proportionately across all of the school divisions participating in any program where such shortfall occurred.  In addition, the Department of Education is authorized each year to temporarily suspend textbook payments made to school divisions from Lottery funds to ensure that any shortfall in Lottery revenue can be accounted for in the remaining textbook payments to be made for the year.


10. The Department of Education is directed to apply a cap on inflation rates in the same manner prescribed in § 51.1-166.B, Code of Virginia, when updating funding to school divisions during the biennial rebenchmarking process.


11. Notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, the Department of Education is directed to combine the end-of-year Average Daily Membership (ADM) for those school divisions who have partnered together as a fiscal agent division and a contractual division for the purposes of calculating prevailing costs included in the Standards of Quality (SOQ).


12. Notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, the Department of Education is directed to include zeros in the linear weighted average calculation of support non-personal costs for the purpose of calculating prevailing costs included in the Standards of Quality (SOQ).


13. Notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, the Department of Education is directed to eliminate the corresponding and appropriate object code(s) related to reported travel expenditures included the linear weighted average non-personal cost calculations for the purpose of calculating prevailing costs included in the Standards of Quality (SOQ).


14. Notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, the Department of Education is directed to eliminate the corresponding and appropriate object code(s) related to reported leases and rental and facility expenditures included the linear weighted average non-personal cost calculations for the purpose of calculating prevailing costs included in the Standards of Quality (SOQ).


15. Notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, the Department of Education is directed to fund transportation costs using a 15 year replacement schedule, which is the national standard guideline, for school bus replacement schedule for the purpose of calculating funded transportation costs included in the Standards of Quality (SOQ).


16. To provide temporary flexibility, notwithstanding any other provision in statute or in this Item, school divisions may elect to increase the teacher to pupil staffing ratios in kindergarten through grade 7 and English classes for grades 6 through twelve by one additional student; the teacher to pupil staffing ratio requirements for Elementary Resource teachers, Prevention, Intervention and Remediation, English as a Second Language, Gifted and Talented, Career and Technical funded programs (other than on Career and Technical courses where school divisions will have to maintain a maximum class size based on federal Occupational Safety & Health Administration safety requirements) are waived; and the instructional and support technology positions, librarians and guidance counselors staffing ratios for new hires are waived.


17. To provide additional flexibility, notwithstanding the provisions of § 22.1-79.1 of the Code of Virginia, any school division that was granted a waiver regarding the opening date of the school year for the 2011-12 school year under the good cause requirements shall continue to be granted a waiver for the 2012-13 school year and the 2013-2014 school year.


B.  General Conditions


1. The Standards of Quality cost in this Item related to fringe benefits shall be limited for instructional staff members to the employer's cost for a number not exceeding the number of instructional positions required by the Standards of Quality for each school division and for their salaries at the statewide prevailing salary levels as printed below.


Instructional Position

First Year Salary

Second Year Salary

Elementary Teachers

$45,118

$45,118

Elementary Assistant Principals

$63,824

$63,824

Elementary Principals

$78,510

$78,510

Secondary Teachers

$47,267

$47,267

Secondary Assistant Principals

$67,824

$67,824

Secondary Principals

$86,464

$86,464

Instructional Aides

$16,223

$16,223


a.1) Payment by the state to a local school division shall be based on the state share of fringe benefit costs of 55 percent of the employer's cost distributed on the basis of the composite index.


2) A locality whose composite index exceeds 0.8000 shall be considered as having an index of 0.8000 for purposes of distributing fringe benefit funds under this provision.


3) The state payment to each school division for retirement, social security, and group life insurance costs for non-instructional personnel is included in and distributed through Basic Aid.


b. Payments to school divisions from this Item shall be calculated using March 31 Average Daily Membership adjusted for half-day kindergarten programs.


c. Payments for health insurance fringe benefits are included in and distributed through Basic Aid.


2. Each locality shall offer a school program for all its eligible pupils which is acceptable to the Department of Education as conforming to the Standards of Quality program requirements.


3. In the event the statewide number of pupils in March 31 ADM results in a state share of cost exceeding the general fund appropriation in this Item, the locality's state share of Basic Aid shall be reduced proportionately so that this general fund appropriation will not be exceeded.  In addition, the required local share of Basic Aid shall also be reduced proportionately to the reduction in the state's share.


4. The Department of Education shall make equitable adjustments in the computation of indices of wealth and in other state-funded accounts for localities affected by annexation, unless a court of competent jurisdiction makes such adjustments.  However, only the indices of wealth and other state-funded accounts of localities party to the annexation will be adjusted.


5. In the event that the actual revenues from the state sales and use tax dedicated to public education and those sales tax revenues transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund and appropriated in this Item (both of which are returned on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service paragraph B. 20. of this Item) for sales in the fiscal year in which the school year begins are different from the number estimated as the basis for this appropriation, the estimated state sales and use tax revenues shall not be adjusted.


6. This appropriation shall be apportioned to the public schools with guidelines established by the Department of Education consistent with legislative intent as expressed in this act.


7.a. Appropriations of state funds in this Item include the number of positions required by the Standards of Quality.  This Item includes a minimum of 51 professional instructional positions and aide positions (C 2); Education of the Gifted, 1.0 professional instructional position (C 3); Occupational-Vocational Education Payments and Special Education Payments; a minimum of 6.0 professional instructional positions and aide positions (C 4 and C 5) for each 1,000 pupils in March 31 ADM each year in support of the current Standards of Quality.  Funding in support of one hour of additional instruction per day based on the percent of students eligible for the federal free lunch program with a pupil-teacher ratio range of 18:1 to 10:1, depending upon a school division's combined failure rate on the English and Math Standards of Learning, is included in Remedial Education Payments (C 8).


b. No actions provided in this section signify any intent of the General Assembly to mandate an increase in the number of instructional personnel per 1,000 students above the numbers explicitly stated in the preceding paragraph.


c. Appropriations in this Item include programs supported in part by transfers to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund pursuant to Part 3 of this Act.  These transfers combined together with other appropriations from the general fund in this Item funds the state's share of the following revisions to the Standards of Quality pursuant to Chapters 939 & 955 of the Acts of Assembly of 2004: five elementary resource teachers per 1,000 students; one support technology position per 1,000 students; one instructional technology position per 1,000 students; and a full daily planning period for teachers at the middle and high school levels in order to relieve the financial pressure these education programs place on local real estate taxes.


d. To provide flexibility, school divisions may use the state and local funds for instructional technology resource teachers required by the Standards of Quality to employ a data coordinator position, an instructional technology resource teacher position, or a data coordinator/instructional resource teacher blended position.  The data coordinator position is intended to serve as a resource to principals and classroom teachers in the area of data analysis and interpretation for instructional and school improvement purposes, as well as for overall data management and administration of state assessments.  School divisions using these SOQ funds in this manner shall only employ instructional personnel licensed by the Board of Education.


e. To provide flexibility in the provision of reading intervention services, school divisions may use the state Early Reading Intervention initiative funding provided from the Lottery Proceeds Fund and the required local matching funds to employ reading specialists to provide the required reading intervention services.  School divisions using the Early Reading Intervention Initiative funds in this manner shall only employ instructional personnel licensed by the Board of Education.


f. To provide flexibility in the provision of mathematics intervention services, school divisions may use the state Standards of Learning Algebra Readiness initiative funding provided from the Lottery Proceeds Fund and the required local matching funds to employ mathematics teacher specialists to provide the required mathematics intervention services.  School divisions using the Standards of Learning Algebra Readiness initiative funding in this manner shall only employ instructional personnel licensed by the Board of Education.


8.a.1) Pursuant to § 22.1-97, Code of Virginia, the Department of Education is required to make calculations at the start of the school year to ensure that school divisions have appropriated adequate funds to support their estimated required local expenditure for the corresponding state fiscal year.  In an effort to reduce the administrative burden on school divisions resulting from state data collections, such as the one needed to make the aforementioned calculations, the requirements of § 22.1-97, Code of Virginia, pertaining to the adequacy of estimated required local expenditures, shall be satisfied by signed certification by each division superintendent at the beginning of each school year that sufficient local funds have been budgeted to meet all state required local effort and required local match amounts.  This provision shall only apply to calculations required of the Department of Education related to estimated required local expenditures and shall not pertain to the calculations associated with actual required local expenditures after the close of the school year.


2) The Department of Education shall also make calculations after the close of the school year to verify that the required local effort level, based on actual March 31 Average Daily Membership, was met.  Pursuant to § 22.1-97, Code of Virginia, the Department of Education shall report annually, no later than the first day of the General Assembly session, to the House Committees on Education and Appropriations and the Senate Committees on Finance and Education and Health, the results of such calculations made after the close of the school year and the degree to which each school division has met, failed to meet, or surpassed its required local expenditure.  The Department of Education shall specify the calculations to determine if a school division has expended its required local expenditure for the Standards of Quality.  This calculation may include but is not limited to the following calculations:


b. The total expenditures for operation, defined as total expenditures less all capital outlays, expenditures for debt service, facilities, non-regular day school programs (such as adult education, preschool, and non-local education programs), and any transfers to regional programs will be calculated.


c. The following state funds will be deducted from the amount calculated in paragraph a. above: revenues from the state sales and use tax (returned on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, as specified in paragraph B. 20. of this Item) for sales in the fiscal year in which the school year begins; total receipts from state funds (except state funds for non-regular day school programs and state funds used for capital or debt service purposes); and the state share of any balances carried forward from the previous fiscal year.  Any qualifying state funds that remain unspent at the end of the fiscal year will be added to the amount calculated in paragraph a. above.


d. Federal funds, and any federal funds carried forward from the previous fiscal year, will also be deducted from the amount calculated in paragraph a above.  Any federal funds that remain unspent at the end of the fiscal year and any capital expenditures paid from federal funds will be added to the amount calculated in paragraph a. above.


e. Tuition receipts, receipts from payments from other cities or counties, and fund transfers will also be deducted from the amount calculated in paragraph a, then


f. The final amount calculated as described above must be equal to or greater than the required local expenditure defined in paragraph A. 5.


g. The Department of Education shall collect the data necessary to perform the calculations of required local expenditure as required by this section.


h. A locality whose expenditure in fact exceeds the required amount from local funds may not reduce its expenditures unless it first complies with all of the Standards of Quality.


9.a. Any required local matching funds which a locality, as of the end of a school year, has not expended, pursuant to this Item, for the Standards of Quality shall be paid by the locality into the general fund of the state treasury.  Such payments shall be made not later than the end of the school year following that in which the under expenditure occurs.


b. Whenever the Department of Education has recovered funds as defined in the preceding paragraph a, the Secretary of Education is authorized to repay to the locality affected by that action, seventy-five percent (75%) of those funds upon his determination that:


1) The local school board agrees to include the funds in its June 30 ending balance for the year following that in which the under expenditure occurs;


2) The local governing body agrees to reappropriate the funds as a supplemental appropriation to the approved budget for the second year following that in which the under expenditure occurs, in an appropriate category as requested by the local school board, for the direct benefit of the students;


3) The local school board agrees to expend these funds, over and above the funds required to meet the required local expenditure for the second year following that in which the under expenditure occurs, for a special project, the details of which must be furnished to the Department of Education for review and approval;


4) The local school board agrees to submit quarterly reports to the Department of Education on the use of funds provided through this project award; and


5) The local governing body and the local school board agree that the project award will be cancelled and the funds withdrawn if the above conditions have not been met as of June 30 of the second year following that in which the under expenditure occurs.


c. There is hereby appropriated, for the purposes of the foregoing repayment, a sum sufficient, not to exceed 75 percent of the funds deposited in the general fund pursuant to the preceding paragraph a.


10. The Department of Education shall specify the manner for collecting the required information and the method for determining if a school division has expended the local funds required to support the actual local match based on all Lottery and Incentive programs in which the school division has elected to participate.  Unless specifically stated otherwise in this Item, school divisions electing to participate in any Lottery or Incentive program that requires a local funding match in order to receive state funding, shall certify to the Department of Education its intent to participate in each program by July 1 each fiscal year in a manner prescribed by the Department of Education.   As part of this certification process, each division superintendent must also certify that adequate local funds have been appropriated, above the required local effort for the Standards of Quality, to support the projected required local match based on the Lottery and Incentive programs in which the school division has elected to participate.  State funding for such program(s) shall not be made until such time that the school division can certify that sufficient local funding has been appropriated to meet required local match.  The Department of Education shall make calculations after the close of the fiscal year to verify that the required local match was met based on the state funds that were received.


11. Any sum of local matching funds for Lottery and Incentive program which a locality has not expended as of the end of a fiscal year in support of the required local match pursuant to this Item shall be paid by the locality into the general fund of the state treasury unless the carryover of those unspent funds is specifically permitted by other provisions of this act.  Such payments shall be made no later than the end of the school year following that in which the under expenditure occurred.


12. The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall provide a report annually, no later than the first day of the General Assembly session, on the status of teacher salaries, by local school division, to the Governor and the Chairmen of the Senate Finance and House Appropriations Committees.  In addition to information on average salaries by school division and statewide comparisons with other states, the report shall also include information on starting salaries by school division and average teacher salaries by school.


13. All state and local matching funds required by the programs in this Item shall be appropriated to the budget of the local school board.


14. By November 15 of each year, the Department of Planning and Budget, in cooperation with the Department of Education, shall prepare and submit a preliminary forecast of Standards of Quality expenditures, based upon the most current data available, to the Chairmen of the House Appropriations and Senate Finance Committees.  In odd-numbered years, the forecast for the current and subsequent two fiscal years shall be provided.  In even-numbered years, the forecast for the current and subsequent fiscal year shall be provided.  The forecast shall detail the projected March 31 Average Daily Membership and the resulting impact on the education budget.


15. School divisions may choose to use state payments provided for Standards of Quality Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation in both years as a block grant for remediation purposes, without restrictions or reporting requirements, other than reporting necessary as a basis for determining funding for the program.


16. Except as otherwise provided in this act, the Superintendent of Public Instruction shall provide guidelines for the distribution and expenditure of general fund appropriations and such additional federal, private and other funds as may be made available to aid in the establishment and maintenance of the public schools.


17. At the Department of Education's option, fees for audio-visual services may be deducted from state Basic Aid payments for individual local school divisions.


18. For distributions not otherwise specified, the Department of Education, at its option, may use prior year data to calculate actual disbursements to individual localities.


19. Payments for accounts related to the Standards of Quality made to localities for public education from the general fund, as provided herein, shall be payable in twenty-four semi-monthly installments at the middle and end of each month.


20. Notwithstanding §22.1-638 D., Code of Virginia, and other language in this item, the Department of Education shall, for purposes of calculating the state and local shares of the Standards of Quality, apportion state sales and use tax dedicated to public education and those sales tax revenues transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/ Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund in the first year based on the July 1, 2010, estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service and, in the second year, based on the July 1, 2011, estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service.


Notwithstanding §22.1-638 D., Code of Virginia, and other language in this item, the State Comptroller shall distribute the state sales and use tax revenues dedicated to public education and those sales tax revenues transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/ Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund in the first year based on the July 1, 2010, estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service and, in the second year, based on the July 1, 2011, estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service.


21. The school divisions within the Tobacco Region, as defined by the Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission, shall jointly explore ways to maximize their collective expenditure reimbursement totals for all eligible E-Rate funding.


22. This Item includes appropriations totaling an estimated $499,460,000 the first year and $462,000,000$532,700,000 the second year from the revenues deposited to the Lottery Proceeds Fund.  These amounts are appropriated for distribution to counties, cities, and towns to support public education programs pursuant to Article X, Section 7-A Constitution of Virginia.  Any county, city, or town which accepts a distribution from this fund shall provide its portion of the cost of maintaining an educational program meeting the Standards of Quality pursuant to Section 2 of Article VIII of the Constitution without the use of distributions from the fund.  


23. For reporting purposes, the Department of Education shall include Lottery Proceeds Funds as state funds.


24.a. Any locality that has met its required local effort for the Standards of Quality accounts for FY 2013 and that has met its required local match for incentive or Lottery-funded programs in which the locality elected to participate in FY 2013 may carry over into fiscal year 2014 any remaining state Direct Aid to Public Education fund balances available to help minimize any FY 2014 revenue adjustments that may occur in state funding to that locality.  Localities electing to carry forward such unspent state funds must appropriate the funds to the school division for expenditure in FY 2014.


b. Any locality that has met its required local effort for the Standards of Quality accounts for FY 2014 and that has met its required local match for incentive or Lottery-funded programs in which the locality elected to participate in FY 2014 may carry over into FY 2015 any remaining state Direct Aid to Public Education fund balances available to help minimize any FY 2015 revenue adjustments that may occur in state funding to that locality.  Localities electing to carry forward such unspent state funds must appropriate the funds to the school division for expenditure in FY 2015.


25. Localities are encouraged to allow school boards to carry over any unspent local allocations into the next fiscal year.  Localities are also encouraged to provide increased flexibility to school boards by appropriating state and local funds for public education in a lump sum.


26. The Department of Education shall include in the annual School Performance Report Card for school divisions the percentage of each division's annual operating budget allocated to instructional costs.  For this report, the Department of Education shall establish a methodology for allocating each school division's expenditures to instructional and non-instructional costs in a manner that is consistent with the funding of the Standards of Quality as approved by the General Assembly.  Further, at the discretion of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, the Department of Education may also report on other methods of measuring instructional spending such as those used by the U.S. Census Bureau and the U.S. Department of Education.


27. By August 15, 2012, each superintendent is requested to submit to the Department of Education a brief description of the range of online learning opportunities currently underway in the school division and any being planned or under consideration in the future, if applicable.


28.  By August 30, 2013, each school superintendent is requested to submit to the Department of Education a brief description of the division's interest in pursuing the development and implementation of year-round school to improve academic performance for those students who are at high risk of educational failure, minority, ESL or economically disadvantaged.  Superintendents are encouraged to describe which students would benefit from year-round school and potential costs.  The Department of Education shall take into consideration those submissions when developing the Direct Aid to Public Education proposed budget for the 2014 General Assembly Session.


C.  Apportionment


1. Subject to the conditions stated in this paragraph and in paragraph B of this Item, each locality shall receive sums as listed above within this program for the basic operation cost and payments in addition to that cost.  The apportionment herein directed shall be inclusive of, and without further payment by reason of, state funds for library and other teaching materials.


2. School Employee Retirement Contributions


a. This Item provides funds to each local school board for the state share of the employer's retirement cost incurred by it, on behalf of instructional personnel, for subsequent transfer to the retirement allowance account as provided by Title 51.1, Chapter 1, Code of Virginia.


b. Notwithstanding § 51.1-1401 of the Code of Virginia, the Commonwealth shall provide payments for only the state share of the Standards of Quality fringe benefit cost of the retiree health care credit.  This Item includes payments in both years based on the state share of fringe benefit costs of 55 percent of the employer's cost on funded Standards of Quality instructional positions, distributed based on the composite index of the local ability-to-pay.


3. School Employee Social Security Contributions


a. This Item provides funds to each local school board for the state share of the employer's Social Security cost incurred by it, on behalf of the instructional personnel for subsequent transfer to the Contribution Fund pursuant to Title 51.1, Chapter 7, Code of Virginia.


b. Appropriations for contributions in paragraphs 2 and 3 above include payments from funds derived from the principal of the Literary Fund in accordance with Article III, Section 8, of the Constitution of Virginia.  The amounts set aside from the Literary Fund for these purposes shall not exceed $140,086,428 the first year and $135,990,713$144,438,573 the second year.


4. School Employee Insurance Contributions


This Item provides funds to each local school board for the state share of the employer's Group Life Insurance cost incurred by it on behalf of instructional personnel who participate in group insurance under the provisions of Title 51.1, Chapter 5, Code of Virginia.


5. Basic Aid Payments


a.1) A state share of the Basic Operation Cost, which cost per pupil in March 31 ADM is established individually for each local school division based on the number of instructional personnel required by the Standards of Quality and the statewide prevailing salary levels (adjusted in Planning District Eight for the cost of competing) as well as recognized support costs calculated on a prevailing basis for an estimated March 31 ADM (adjusted for half-day kindergarten programs).


2) This appropriation includes funding to recognize the common labor market in the Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, DC-MD-VA-WV Combined Statistical Area.  Standards of Quality salary payments for instructional positions in school divisions of the localities set out below have been adjusted for the equivalent portion of the Cost of Competing Adjustment (COCA) rates that are paid to local school divisions in Planning District 8.  For the counties of Stafford, Fauquier, Spotsylvania, Clarke, Warren, Frederick, and Culpeper and the Cities of Fredericksburg and Winchester, the SOQ payments have been increased by 25 percent each year of the COCA rates paid to school divisions in Planning District 8.


3) This appropriation includes funding for the Standards of Quality salary payments for support positions in school divisions of the localities set out below and have been adjusted for the equivalent portion of the Cost of Competing Adjustment (COCA) rates that are paid to the local school divisions in Planning District 8 for SOQ Basic Aid support positions, which is 22.70 percent in the first year and 6.98 percent in the second year.  For the counties of Stafford, Fauquier, Spotsylvania, Clarke, Warren, Frederick, and Culpeper and the Cities of Fredericksburg and Winchester, the SOQ payments have been increased each year by 25 percent of the COCA rates paid to school divisions in Planning District 8.


b. The state share for a locality shall be equal to the Basic Operation Cost for that locality less the locality's estimated revenues from the state sales and use tax (returned on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service, as specified in paragraph B. 20. of this Item), in the fiscal year in which the school year begins and less the required local expenditure.


c. For the purpose of this paragraph, the Department of Taxation's fiscal year sales and use tax estimates are as cited in this Item.


d. 1) In accordance with the provisions of § 37.2-713, Code of Virginia, the Department of Education shall deduct the locality's share for the education of handicapped pupils residing in institutions within the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services from the locality's Basic Aid payments.


2) The amounts deducted from Basic Aid for the education of intellectually disabled persons shall be transferred to the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services in support of the cost of educating such persons; the amount deducted from Basic Aid for the education of emotionally disturbed persons shall be used to cover extraordinary expenses incurred in the education of such persons.  The Department of Education shall establish guidelines to implement these provisions and shall provide for the periodic transfer of sums due from each local school division to the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Services and for Special Education categorical payments.  The amount of the actual transfers will be based on data accumulated during the prior school year.


e. 1) The apportionment to localities of all driver education revenues received during the school year shall be made as an undesignated component of the state share of Basic Aid in accordance with the provisions of this Item.  Only school divisions complying with the standardized program established by the Board of Education shall be entitled to participate in the distribution of state funds appropriated for driver education.  The Department of Education will deduct a designated amount per pupil from a school division's Basic Aid payment when the school division is not in compliance with § 22.1-205 C, Code of Virginia.  Such amount will be computed by dividing the current appropriation for the Driver Education Fund by actual March 31 ADM.


2) Local school boards may charge a per pupil fee for behind-the-wheel driver education provided, however, that the fee charged plus the per pupil basic aid reimbursement for driver education shall not exceed the actual average per pupil cost.  Such fees shall not be cause for a pro rata reduction in Basic Aid payments to school divisions.


f. Textbooks


1) The appropriation in this Item includes $45,846,044 the second year from the general fund and $61,262,666 the first year and $15,709,881$61,660,423 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund as the state's share of the cost of textbooks based on a per pupil amount of $89.73 the first year and $89.73 the second year.  The state's share of textbooks will be fund split between the general fund and Lottery Proceeds Fund.  A school division shall appropriate these funds for textbooks or any other public education instructional expenditure by the school division.  The state's distributions for textbooks shall be based on adjusted March 31 ADM.  These funds shall be matched by the local government, based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


2) School divisions shall provide free textbooks to all students.


3) School divisions may use a portion of this funding to purchase Standards of Learning instructional materials.  School divisions may also use these funds to purchase electronic textbooks or other electronic media resources integral to the curriculum and classroom instruction and the technical equipment required to read and access the electronic textbooks and electronic curriculum materials.


4) Any funds provided to school divisions for textbook costs that are unexpended as of June 30, 2013, or June 30, 2014, shall be carried on the books of the locality to be appropriated to the school division the following year to be used for same purpose.  School divisions are permitted to carry forward any remaining balance of textbook funds until the funds are expensed for a qualifying purpose.


g. The one-cent state sales and use tax earmarked for education and the sales tax revenues transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund and appropriated in this Item which are distributed to localities on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service as specified in paragraph B. 20. of this Item shall be reflected in each locality's annual budget for educational purposes as a separate revenue source for the current fiscal year.


h. The appropriation for the Standards of Quality for Public Education (SOQ) includes amounts estimated at $222,800,000 the first year and $230,400,000$334,700,000 the second year from the amounts transferred to the general fund from the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund pursuant to Part 3 of this act which are derived from the 1/40.375 cent increase in the state sales and use tax levied pursuant to Chapter 3, 2004 Special Session I§58.1-638, Code of Virginia.  These additional funds are provided to local school divisions and local governments in order to relieve the financial pressure education programs place on local real estate taxes.


i. From the total amounts in paragraph h. above, an amount estimated at $105,300,000 the first year and $108,300,000$223,200,000 the second year (approximately 1/81/4 cent of sales and use tax) is appropriated to support a portion of the cost of the state's share of the following revisions to the Standards of Quality pursuant to Chapters 939 & 955 of the Acts of Assembly of 2004: five elementary resource teachers per 1,000 students; one support and one instructional technology position per 1,000 students; a full daily planning period for teachers at the middle and high school levels in order to relieve the pressure on local real estate taxes and shall be taken into account by the governing body of the county, city, or town in setting real estate tax rates.


j. From the total amounts in paragraph h. above, an amount estimated at $117,500,000 the first year and $122,100,000$117,800,000 the second year (approximately 1/8 cent of sales and use tax) is appropriated in this Item to distribute the remainder of the revenues collected and deposited into the Public Education Standards of Quality/Local Real Estate Property Tax Relief Fund on the basis of the latest yearly estimate of school age population provided by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service as specified in paragraph B. 20. of this Item.


k. For the purposes of funding certain support positions in Basic Aid a funding ratio methodology is used based upon the prevailing ratio of support positions to SOQ funded instructional positions as established in Chapter 781, 2009 Acts of Assembly.  For the purposes of making the required spending adjustments, the appropriation and distribution of Basic Aid shall reflect this methodology.  Local school divisions shall have the discretion as to where the adjustment may be made, consistent with the Standards of Quality funded in this Act.


6. Education of the Gifted Payments


a. An additional payment shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to local school divisions to support the state share of one full-time equivalent instructional position per 1,000 students in adjusted March 31 ADM.


b. Local school divisions are required to spend, as part of the required local expenditure for the Standards of Quality the established per pupil cost for gifted education (state and local share) on approved programs for the gifted.


7. Occupational-Vocational Education Payments


a. An additional payment shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to the local school divisions to support the state share of the number of Vocational Education instructors required by the Standards of Quality.  These funds shall be disbursed on the same basis as the payment is calculated.


b. An amount estimated at $107,592,002 the first year and $107,779,695 the second year from the general fund included in Basic Aid Payments relates to vocational education programs in support of the Standards of Quality.


8. Special Education Payments


a. An additional payment shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to the local school divisions to support the state share of the number of Special Education instructors required by the Standards of Quality.  These funds shall be disbursed on the same basis as the payment is calculated.


b. Out of the amounts for special education payments, general fund support is provided to fund the caseload standards for speech pathologists at 68 students for each year of the biennium.


9. Remedial Education Payments


a. An additional payment estimated at $85,106,596 the first year and $85,280,308$85,370,938 the second year from the general fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to support the Board of Education's Standards of Quality Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation program adopted in June 2003.


b. The payment shall be calculated based on one hour of additional instruction per day for identified students, using the three year average percent of students eligible for the federal Free Lunch program as a proxy for students needing such services.  Fall membership shall be multiplied by the three year average division-level Free Lunch eligibility percentage to determine the estimated number of students eligible for services.  Pupil-teacher ratios shall be applied to the estimated number of eligible students to determine the number of instructional positions needed for each school division.  The pupil-teacher ratio applied for each school division shall range from 10:1 for those divisions with the most severe combined three year average failure rates for English and math Standards of Learning test scores to 18:1 for those divisions with the lowest combined three year average failure rates for English and math Standards of Learning test scores.


c. Funding shall be matched by the local government based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


d. To provide flexibility in the instruction of English Language Learners who have limited English proficiency and who are at risk of not meeting state accountability standards, school divisions may use state and local funds from the SOQ Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation account to employ additional English Language Learner teachers to provide instruction to identified limited English proficiency students.  Using these funds in this manner is intended to supplement the instructional services provided through the SOQ staffing standard of 17 instructional positions per 1,000 limited English proficiency students.  School divisions using the SOQ Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation funds in this manner shall only employ instructional personnel licensed by the Board of Education.


e. An additional state payment estimated at $78,734,853 the first year and $78,626,984$78,687,071 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed based on the estimated number of federal Free Lunch participants, in support of programs for students who are educationally at risk.  The additional payment shall be based on the state share of:


1) A minimum one percent add-on, as a percent of the per pupil basic aid cost, for each child who qualifies for the federal Free Lunch Program; and


2) An addition to the add-on, based on the concentration of children qualifying for the federal Free Lunch Program.  Based on its percentage of Free Lunch participants, each school division will receive between 1 and 12 percent in additional basic aid per Free Lunch participant.  These funds shall be matched by the local government, based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


3a) Local school divisions are required to spend the established at-risk payment (state and local share) on approved programs for students who are educationally at risk.


b) To receive these funds, each school division shall certify to the Department of Education that the state and local share of the at-risk payment will be used to support approved programs for students who are educationally at risk.  These programs may include: Dropout Prevention, community and school-based truancy officer programs, Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID), Project Discovery, Reading Recovery, programs for students who speak English as a second language, or programs related to increasing the success of disadvantaged students in completing a high school degree and providing opportunities to encourage further education and training.  Further, any new funds a school division receives in excess of the amounts received in FY 2008 may be used first to provide data coordinators or to purchase similar services for schools that have not met Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) under the federal No Child Left Behind Act or are not fully accredited under the Standards of Accreditation.  The data coordinator position is intended to provide schools with needed support in the area of data analysis and interpretation for instructional purposes, as well as overall data management and the administration of state assessments.  The position would primarily focus on data related to instruction and school improvement, including: student assessment, student attendance, student/teacher engagement, behavior referrals, suspensions, retention, and graduation rates.


f. Regional Alternative Education Programs


1) An additional state payment of $7,802,104 the first year and $8,061,000$8,048,710 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed for Regional Alternative Education programs. Such programs shall be for the purpose of educating certain expelled students and, as appropriate, students who have received suspensions from public schools and students returned to the community from the Department of Juvenile Justice.


2) Each regional program shall have a small student/staff ratio.  Such staff shall include, but not be limited to education, mental health, health, and law enforcement professionals, who will collaborate to provide for the academic, psychological, and social needs of the students.  Each program shall be designed to ensure that students make the transition back into the "mainstream" within their local school division.


3) a) Regional alternative education programs are funded through this Item based on the state's share of the incremental per pupil cost for providing such programs. This incremental per pupil payment shall be adjusted for the composite index of local ability-to-pay of the school division that counts such students attending such program in its March 31 Average Daily Membership. It is the intent of the General Assembly that this incremental per pupil amount be in addition to the basic aid per pupil funding provided to the affected school division for such students. Therefore, local school divisions are encouraged to provide the appropriate portion of the basic aid per pupil funding to the regional programs for students attending these programs, adjusted for costs incurred by the school division for transportation, administration, and any portion of the school day or school year that the student does not attend such program.


b) In the event a school division does not use all of the student slots it is allocated under this program, the unused slots may be reallocated or transferred to another school division.


1. A school division must request from the Department of Education the availability and possible use of any unused student slots.  If any unused slots are available and if the requesting school division chooses to utilize any of the unused slots, the requesting school division shall only receive the state's share of tuition for the unused slot that was allocated in this Item for the originally designated school division.


2. However, no requesting school division shall receive more tuition funding from the state for any requested unused slot than what would have been the calculated amount for the requesting school division had the unused slot been allocated to the requesting school division in the original budget.  Furthermore, the requesting school division shall pay for any remaining tuition payment necessary for using a previously unused slot.


3. The Department of Education shall provide assistance for the state share of the incremental cost of Regional Alternative Education program operations based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


g. Remedial Summer School


1) This appropriation includes $15,329,431 the first year and $23,435,017 the second year from the general fund and $6,433,605 the first year and $23,152,232 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund for the state's share of Remedial Summer School Programs.  These funds are available to school divisions for the operation of programs designed to remediate students who are required to attend such programs during a summer school session or during an intersession in the case of year-round schools.  These funds may be used in conjunction with other sources of state funding for remediation or intervention. School divisions shall have maximum flexibility with respect to the use of these funds and the types of remediation programs offered; however, in exercising this flexibility, students attending these programs shall not be charged tuition and no high school credit may be awarded to students who participate in this program.


2) For school divisions charging students tuition for summer high school credit courses, consideration shall be given to students from households with extenuating financial circumstances who are repeating a class in order to graduate.


10. K-3 Primary Class Size Reduction Payments


a. An additional payment estimated at $102,671,654 the first year and $106,431,479$103,971,881 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education as an incentive for reducing class sizes in the primary grades.


b. The Department of Education shall calculate the payment based on the incremental cost of providing the lower class sizes based on the lower of the division average per pupil cost of all divisions or the actual division per pupil cost.


c. Localities are required to provide a match for these funds based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


d. By October 15 of each year school divisions must provide data to the Department of Education that each participating school has a September 30 pupil/teacher ratio in grades K through 3 that meet the following criteria:


Qualifying School Percentage of Students Approved

 

 

 

Grades K-3

Maximum Individual

Eligible for Free Lunch

School Ratio

K-3 Class Size

30% but less than 45%

19 to 1

24

45% but less than 55%

18 to 1

23

55% but less than 65%

17 to 1

22

65% but less than 70%

16 to 1

21

70% but less than 75%

15 to 1

20

75% or more

14 to 1

19


e. School divisions may elect to have eligible schools participate at a higher ratio, or only in a portion of grades kindergarten through three, with a commensurate reduction of state and required local funds, if local conditions do not permit participation at the established ratio and/or maximum individual class size.  In the event that a school division requires additional actions to ensure participation at the established ratio and/or maximum individual class size, such actions must be completed by December 1 of the impacted school year.  Special education teachers and instructional aides shall not be counted towards meeting these required pupil/teacher ratios in grades kindergarten through three.


f. The Superintendent of Public Instruction may grant waivers to school divisions for the class size requirement in eligible schools that have only one class in an affected grade level in the school.


g. It is the intent of the General Assembly that for the first and second year only, school divisions may have the flexibility to be considered to meet the requirements of this program if the ratio for each school is no more than three students higher than those otherwise required for this program.


11. Literary Fund Subsidy Program Payments


a. The Department Board of Education and the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) shall provide a program of funding for school construction and renovation through the Literary Fund and through VPSA bond sales.  The program shall be used to provide funds, through Literary Fund loans and subsidies, and through VPSA bond sales, to fund a portion of the projects on the First or Second Literary Fund Waiting List, or other critical projects which may receive priority placement on the First or Second Literary Fund Waiting List by the Department Board of Education.  Interest rate subsidies will provide school divisions with the present value difference in debt service between a Literary Fund loan and a borrowing through the VPSA.  To qualify for an interest rate subsidy, the school division's project must be eligible for a Literary Fund loan and shall be subject to the same restrictions.  The VPSA shall work with the Board of Education in selecting those projects to be funded through the interest rate subsidy/bond financing program, so as to ensure the maximum leverage of Literary Fund moneys and a minimum impact on the VPSA Bond Pool.


b. The Department Board of Education may offer Literary Fund loans from the uncommitted balances of the Literary Fund after meeting the obligations of the interest rate subsidy sales and the amounts set aside from the Literary Fund for Debt Service Payments for Education Technology in this Item.


c. 1) In the event that on any scheduled payment date of bonds of the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) authorized under the provisions of a bond resolution adopted subsequent to June 30, 1997, issued subsequent to June 30, 1997, and not benefiting from the provisions of either § 22.1-168 (iii), (iv), and (v), Code of Virginia, or § 22.1-168.1, Code of Virginia, the sum of (i) the payments on general obligation school bonds of cities, counties, and towns (localities) paid to the VPSA and (ii) the proceeds derived from the application of the provisions of § 15.2-2659, Code of Virginia, to such bonds of localities, is less than the debt service due on such bonds of the VPSA on such date, there is hereby appropriated to the VPSA, first, from available moneys of the Literary Fund and, second, from the general fund a sum equal to such deficiency.


2) The Commonwealth shall be subrogated to the VPSA to the extent of any such appropriation paid to the VPSA and shall be entitled to enforce the VPSA's remedies with respect to the defaulting locality and to full recovery of the amount of such deficiency, together with interest at the rate of the defaulting locality's bonds.


d. The chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the VPSA shall, on or before November 1 of each year, make and deliver to the Governor and the Secretary of Finance a certificate setting forth his estimate of total debt service during each fiscal year of the biennium on bonds of the VPSA issued and projected to be issued during such biennium pursuant to the bond resolution referred to in paragraph a above.  The Governor's budget submission each year shall include provisions for the payment of debt service pursuant to paragraph 1) above.


12. Educational Technology Payments


a. Any unobligated amounts transferred to the educational technology fund shall be disbursed on a pro rata basis to localities.  The additional funds shall be used for technology needs identified in the division's technology plan approved by the Department of Education.


b. The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $12,610,500 the first year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2008.


c. The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $12,156,000 the first year and $12,154,000 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2009.


d.1) The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $11,911,750 the first year and $11,907,250 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2010.


2) It is the intent of the General Assembly to authorize sufficient appropriate Literary Fund revenues to pay debt service on the Virginia Public School Authority bonds or notes authorized for this program.  In developing the proposed 2014-16 biennial budget for public education, the Department Board of Education shall include a recommendation to the Governor to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to make debt service payments for this program in FY 2015.


e. 1) The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $11,666,600 the first year and $11,669,000 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2011.


2) It is the intent of the General Assembly to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to pay debt service on the Virginia Public School Authority bonds or notes authorized for this program. In developing the proposed 2014-16 biennial budget for public education, the Department Board of Education shall include a recommendation to the Governor to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to make debt service payments for this program in FY 2015 and FY 2016.


f.1) The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at  $12,353,630 the first year and $11,982,000 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2012.


2) The Department of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $12,386,619 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in 2013.


23) It is the intent of the General Assembly to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to pay debt service on the Virginia Public School Authority bonds or notes authorized for this program. In developing the proposed 2014-16 and 2016-18 biennial budgets for public education, the Department Board of Education shall include a recommendation to the Governor to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to make debt service payments for this program in fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017.


g. 1) An education technology grant program shall be conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority, through the issuance of equipment notes in an amount estimated at $59,846,000 in FY 2013 and $59,612,000 $64,316,100 in FY 2014.  Proceeds of the notes will be used to establish a computer-based instructional and testing system for the Standards of Learning (SOL) and to develop the capability for high speed Internet connectivity at high schools followed by middle schools followed by elementary schools.  By FY 2011, high schools within the division shall administer 100 percent of SOL tests online; by FY 2012, middle and high schools shall administer 100 percent of SOL tests online; and by FY 2013, elementary, middle, and high schools shall administer 100 percent of SOL tests online.  School divisions shall use these funds first to develop and maintain the capability to support the administration of online SOL testing for all students with the exception of students with a documented need for a paper SOL test.


2) The Department Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $12,512,675 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the education technology grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in FY 2013.


3) It is the intent of the General Assembly to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to pay debt service on the Virginia Public School Authority bonds or notes authorized for education technology grant programs in FY 2013 and in FY 2014.  In developing the proposed 2014-16, 2016-2018, and 2018-2020 biennial budgets for public education, the Board of Education shall include a recommendation to the Governor to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to make debt service payments for these programs in fiscal years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.


4) Grant funds from the issuance of $59,846,000 in FY 2013 and $59,612,000 $64,316,100 in FY 2014 in equipment notes are based on a grant of $26,000 per school and $50,000 per school division.  For purposes of this grant program, eligible schools shall include schools that are subject to state accreditation and reporting membership in grades K through 12 as of September 30, 2012, for the FY 2013 issuance, and September 30, 2013, for the FY 2014 issuance, as well as regional vocational centers, special education centers, alternative education centers, regular school year Governor's Schools, and the School for the Deaf and the Blind.  Schools that serve only pre-kindergarten students shall not be eligible for this grant.


5) Supplemental grants shall be allocated to eligible divisions to support schools that are not fully accredited in accordance with this paragraph.  Schools that administer SOL tests in Spring 2012 and that are not fully accredited based on school accreditation ratings in effect for FY 2013 will qualify for a supplemental grant of $26,000 per school in fiscal year 2013. Schools that are fully accredited or that are new schools with conditional accreditation in their first year shall not be eligible to receive this supplemental grant.    Schools that administer SOL tests in Spring 2013 and that are not fully accredited based on school accreditation ratings in effect for FY 2014 will qualify to participate in the Virginia e-Learning Backpack Initiative in FY 2014 and receive: (1) a supplemental grant of $400 per student reported in ninth grade fall membership in a qualifying school for the purchase of a tablet computer device for that student and (2) a supplemental grant of $2,400 per qualifying school to purchase two content creation packages for teachers.  Schools eligible to receive this supplemental grant in FY 2014 shall continue to receive the grant for the number of subsequent years equaling the number of grades 9 through 12 in the qualifying school up to a maximum of four years.  Grants awarded to qualifying schools that do not have grades 10, 11, or 12 may transition with the students to the primary receiving school for all years subsequent to grade 9.  Schools eligible to receive these grants for a period of up to four years beginning in FY 2014 shall not be eligible to receive a separate award in the future once the original award period has concluded.  Schools that are fully accredited or that are new schools with conditional accreditation in their first year shall not be eligible to receive this supplemental grant.


6) Required local match:


a) Localities are required to provide a match for these funds equal to 20 percent of the grant amount, including the supplemental grants provided pursuant to paragraph g. 5).  At least 25 percent of the local match shall be used for teacher training in the use of instructional technology.  The Superintendent of Public Instruction is authorized to reduce the required local match for school divisions with a composite index of local ability-to-pay below 0.2000.  The Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind is exempt from the match requirement.


b) School divisions that administer 100 percent of SOL tests online in all elementary, middle, and high schools may use up to 75 percent of their required local match to purchase targeted technology-based interventions.  Such interventions may include the necessary technology and software to support online learning, technology-based content systems, content management systems, technology equipment systems, information and data management systems, and other appropriate technologies that support the individual needs of learners.  School divisions that receive supplemental grants in the first year of $26,000 per school pursuant to paragraph g. 5) and where 100 percent of SOL tests are administered online in the schools receiving the supplemental grants shall give first priority to purchasing these technology-based interventions as well as teacher training in the use of the interventions from their required local match.  School divisions that receive supplemental grants in the second year pursuant to paragraph g.5) above shall use the funds in qualifying schools to purchase tablet computer devices for ninth grade students reported in fall membership and content creation packages for teachers.


7) The goal of the education technology grant program is to improve the instructional, remedial, and testing capabilities of the Standards of Learning for local school divisions and to increase the number of schools achieving full accreditation.


8) Funds shall be used in the following manner:


a) Each division shall use funds to reach a goal, in each high school, of: (1) a 5-to-1 student to computer ratio; (2) an Internet-ready local area network (LAN) capability; and (3) high speed access to the Internet.  School connectivity (computers, LANs and network access) shall include sufficient download/upload capability to ensure that each student will have adequate access to Internet-based instructional, remedial and assessment programs.


b) When each high school in a division meets the goals established in paragraph a) above, the remaining funds shall be used to develop similar capability in first the middle schools and then the elementary schools.


c) For purposes of establishing or enhancing a computer-based instructional program supporting the Standards of Learning pursuant to paragraph g. 1) above, these grant funds may be used to purchase handheld multifunctional computing devices that support a broad range of applications and that are controlled by operating systems providing full multimedia support and mobile Internet connectivity.  School divisions that elect to use these grant funds to purchase such qualifying handheld devices must continue to meet the on-line testing requirements stated in paragraph g. 1) above.


d) School divisions shall be eligible to apply for and receive supplemental grants of $26,000 per qualifying school in the first year pursuant to paragraph g. 5).  These supplemental grants shall be used first for the purpose of developing and maintaining capacity to support 100 percent online SOL testing of all students in qualifying schools and helping the schools achieve full accreditation with the assistance of targeted technology-based interventions.  Any purchase of technology-based interventions as described in paragraph g. 6) b) with supplemental grant funds must be qualifying expenses under the technology notes program.  Eligibility for these funds requires divisions to submit an application and plan that includes goals, objectives, strategies, and a timeline for implementation.  Division plans will be reviewed and approved by the Superintendent of Public Instruction prior to disbursement of the supplemental grant funds.


e) School divisions shall be eligible to receive supplemental grants in the second year pursuant to paragraph g.5) above.  These supplemental grants shall be used in qualifying schools for the purchase of tablet computer devices for ninth grade students reported in fall membership and content creation packages for teachers. Participating school divisions will be required to select a core set of electronic textbooks, applications and online services for productivity, learning management, collaboration, practice, and assessment to be included on all devices.  In addition, participating school divisions will assume recurring costs for electronic textbook purchases and maintenance. 


f) Pursuant to § 15.2-1302, Code of Virginia, and in the event that two or more school divisions became one school division, whether by consolidation of only the school divisions or by consolidation of the local governments, such resulting division shall be provided funding through this program on the basis of having the same number of school divisions as existed prior to September 30, 2000.


9) Local school divisions shall maximize the use of available federal funds, including E-Rate Funds, and to the extent possible, use such funds to supplement the program and meet the goals of this program.


h. The Department of Education shall maintain criteria to determine if high schools, middle schools, or elementary schools have the capacity to meet the goals of this initiative.  The Department of Education shall be responsible for the project management of this program.


i.1) In the event that, on any scheduled payment date of bonds or notes of the Virginia Public School Authority (VPSA) issued for the purpose described in § 22.1-166.2, Code of Virginia, and not benefiting from the provisions of either § 22.1-168 (iii), (iv) and (v), Code of Virginia, or § 22.1-168.1, Code of Virginia, the available moneys in the Literary Fund are less than the amounts authorized for debt service due on such bonds or notes of the VPSA on such date, there is hereby appropriated to the VPSA from the general fund a sum equal to such deficiency.


2) The Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the VPSA shall, on or before November 1 of each year, make and deliver to the Governor and the Secretary of Finance a certificate setting forth his estimate of total debt service during each fiscal year of the biennium on bonds and notes of the VPSA issued and projected to be issued during such biennium pursuant to the resolution referred to in paragraph 1) above.  The Governor's budget submission each year shall include provisions for the payment of debt service pursuant to paragraph 1) above.


j. Unspent proceeds of the notes, including investment income derived from the proceeds of the notes may be used to pay interest on, or to decrease principal of the notes.


k.1) For the purposes of § 56-232, Code of Virginia, "Contracts of Telephone Companies with State Government" and for the purposes of § 56-234 "Contracts for Service Rendered by a Telephone Company for the State Government" shall be deemed to include communications lines into public schools which are used for educational technology.  The rate structure for such lines shall be negotiated by the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Chief Information Officer of the Virginia Information Technologies Agency.  Further, the Superintendent and Director are authorized to encourage the development of "by-pass" infrastructure in localities where it fails to obtain competitive prices or prices consistent with the best rates obtained in other parts of the state.


2) The State Corporation Commission, in its consideration of the discount for services provided to elementary schools, secondary schools, and libraries and the universal service funding mechanisms as provided under § 254 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, is hereby encouraged to make the discounts for intrastate services provided to elementary schools, secondary schools, and libraries for educational purposes as large as is prudently possible and to fund such discounts through the universal fund as provided in § 254 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  The commission shall proceed as expeditiously as possible in implementing these discounts and the funding mechanism for intrastate services, consistent with the rules of the Federal Communications Commission aimed at the preservation and advancement of universal service.


13. Security Equipment Payments


1) A security equipment grant program shall be conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority, through the issuance of equipment notes in an amount estimated at up to $6,000,000 in fiscal year 2013 and $6,000,000 in fiscal year 2014 in conjunction with the Virginia Public School Authority technology notes program authorized in 139.C.12. above.  Proceeds of the notes will be used to help offset the related costs associated with the purchase of appropriate security equipment that will improve and help ensure the safety of students attending public schools in Virginia.


2) The Board of Education shall authorize amounts estimated at $1,300,000 $1,288,145 the second year from the Literary Fund to provide debt service payments for the security equipment grant program conducted through the Virginia Public School Authority in fiscal year 2013.


3) It is the intent of the General Assembly to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to pay debt service on the Virginia Public School Authority bonds or notes authorized for this program.  In developing the proposed 2014-16, 2016-2018, and 2018-2020 biennial budgets for public education, the Board of Education shall include a recommendation to the Governor to authorize sufficient Literary Fund revenues to make debt service payments for these programs in fiscal years 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019.


4) In the event that, on any scheduled payment date of bonds or notes of the Virginia Public School Authority issued for the purpose described in § 22.1-166.2, Code of Virginia, and not benefiting from the provisions of either § 22.1-168 (iii), (iv) and (v), Code of Virginia, or § 22.1-168.1, Code of Virginia, the available moneys in the Literary Fund are less than the amounts authorized for debt service due on such bonds or notes on such date, there is hereby appropriated to the Virginia Public School Authority from the general fund a sum equal to such deficiency.


5) The Chairman of the Board of Commissioners of the Virginia Public School Authority shall, on or before November 1 of each year, deliver to the Governor and the Secretary of Finance a certificate setting forth his estimate of total debt service during each fiscal year of the biennium on bonds and notes issued and projected to be issued during such biennium.  The Governor's budget submission each year shall include provisions for the payment of debt service pursuant to paragraph 1) above.


6) Grant award funds from the issuance of up to $6,000,000 in fiscal year 2013 and $6,000,000 in fiscal year 2014 in equipment notes shall be distributed to eligible school divisions.  The grant awards will be based on a competitive grant basis of up to $100,000 per school division. School divisions will be permitted to apply annually for grant funding.  For purposes of this program, eligible schools shall include schools that are subject to state accreditation and reporting membership in grades K through 12 as of September 30, 2012, for the fiscal year 2013 issuance, and September 30, 2013, for the fiscal year 2014 issuance, as well as regional vocational centers, special education centers, alternative education centers, regular school year Governor's Schools, and the Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind.


7) School divisions would submit their application to Department of Education by August 1 of each year based on the criteria developed by the Department of Education in collaboration with the Department of Criminal Justice Services who will provide requested technical support. Furthermore, the Department of Education will have the authority to make such grant awards to such school divisions.


8) It is also the intent of the General Assembly that the total amount of the grant awards shall not exceed $30,000,000 over any ongoing revolving five year period.


9) Required local match:


a) Localities are required to provide a match for these funds equal to 25 percent of the grant amount. The Superintendent of Public Instruction is authorized to reduce the required local match for school divisions with a composite index of local ability-to-pay below 0.2000. The Virginia School for the Deaf and the Blind is exempt from the match requirement.


b) Pursuant to § 15.2-1302, Code of Virginia, and in the event that two or more school divisions became one school division, whether by consolidation of only the school divisions or by consolidation of the local governments, such resulting division shall be provided funding through this program on the basis of having the same number of school divisions as existed prior to September 30, 2012 2000.


c) Local school divisions shall maximize the use of available federal funds, including E-Rate Funds, and to the extent possible, use such funds to supplement the program and meet the goals of this program.


14. Virginia Preschool Initiative Payments


a.1) It is the intent of the General Assembly that a payment estimated at $64,953,097 the first year and $68,569,714 $67,424,295 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to schools and community-based organizations to provide quality preschool programs for at-risk four-year-olds unserved by Head Start program funding.  In no event shall distributions from the Lottery Proceeds Fund be made directly to community-based or private providers.


2) These state funds and required local matching funds shall be used to provide programs for at-risk four-year-old children, which include quality preschool education, health services, social services, parental involvement and transportation.  It shall be the policy of the Commonwealth that state funds and required local matching funds for the Virginia Preschool Initiative not be used for capital outlay.  Programs must provide full-day or half-day and, at least, school-year services.


3) The Department of Education, in cooperation with the Council on Child Day Care and Early Childhood Programs, shall establish academic standards that are in accordance with appropriate preparation for students to be ready to successfully enter kindergarten.  These standards shall be established in such a manner as to be measurable for student achievement and success. Students shall be required to be evaluated in the fall and in the spring by each participating school division and the school divisions must certify that the Virginia Preschool Initiative program follows the established standards in order to receive the funding for quality preschool education and criteria for the service components.  Such guidelines shall be consistent with the findings of the November 1993 study by the Board of Education, the Department of Education, and the Council on Child Day Care and Early Childhood Programs.


4)a) Grants shall be distributed based on an allocation formula providing the state share of a $6,000 grant for 100 percent of the unserved at-risk four-year-olds in each locality for a full-day program.  The number of unserved at-risk four-year-olds in each locality shall be based on the projected number of kindergarten students, updated once each biennium for the Governor's introduced biennial budget.  For FY 2013 and FY 2014 only, the number of slots funded in each school division shall be the higher of the calculated slots based on projected kindergarten enrollments or the lesser of either the calculated slots using projections of four-year-olds from the Virginia Employment Commission or the actual number of slots utilized in FY 2012.  Programs operating half-day shall receive state funds based on a fractional basis determined by the pro-rata portion of a full-day, school year program provided.  Half-day programs shall operate for a minimum of three hours of classroom instructional time per day, excluding breaks for lunch or recess, and grants to half-day programs shall be funded based on the state share of $3,000 per unserved at-risk four-year-old in each locality.  Full-day programs shall operate for a minimum of five and one-half instructional hours, excluding breaks for meals and recess.  No additional state funding is provided for programs operating greater than three hours per day but less than five and one-half hours per day.  In determining the state and local shares of funding, the composite index of local ability-to-pay is capped at 0.5000.


b) For new programs in the first year of implementation only, programs operating less than a full school year shall receive state funds on a fractional basis determined by the pro-rata portion of a school year program provided.  In determining the prorated state funds to be received, a school year shall be 180 days.


b.1) Any locality which desires to participate in this grant program must submit a proposal through its chief administrator (county administrator or city manager) by June 15 of each year. The chief administrator, in conjunction with the school superintendent, shall identify a lead agency for this program within the locality.  The lead agency shall be responsible for developing a local plan for the delivery of quality preschool services to at-risk children which demonstrates the coordination of resources and the combination of funding streams in an effort to serve the greatest number of at-risk four-year-old children.


2) The proposal must demonstrate coordination with all parties necessary for the successful delivery of comprehensive services, including the schools, child care providers, local social services agency, Head Start, local health department, and other groups identified by the lead agency.


3) A local match, based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay, shall be required.  For purposes of meeting the local match, localities may use local expenditures for existing qualifying programs, however, at least seventy-five percent of the local match will be cash and no more than twenty-five percent will be in-kind. In-kind contributions are defined as cash outlays that are made by the locality that benefit the program but are not directly charged to the program.  The value of fixed assets cannot be considered as an in-kind contribution.  Localities shall also continue to pursue and coordinate other funding sources, including child care subsidies.  Funds received through this program must be used to supplement, not supplant, any funds currently provided for programs within the locality.  However, in the event a locality is prohibited from continuing the previous level of support to programs for at-risk four-year-olds from Title I of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), the state and local funds provided in this grants program may be used to continue services to these Title I students.  Such prohibition may occur due to amendments to the allocation formula in the reauthorization of ESEA as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 or due to a percentage reduction in a locality's Title I allocation in 20011-2012 or 2012-2013.  Any locality so affected shall provide written evidence to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and request his approval to continue the services to Title I students.


c. Local plans must provide clear methods of service coordination for the purpose of reducing the per child cost for the service, increasing the number of at-risk children served and/or extending services for the entire year.  Examples of these include:


1) "Wraparound Services" -- methods for combining funds such as child care subsidy dollars administered by local social service agencies with dollars for quality preschool education programs.


2) "Wrap-out Services" - methods for using grant funds to purchase quality preschool services to at-risk four-year-old children through an existing child care setting by purchasing comprehensive services within a setting which currently provides quality preschool education.


3) "Expansion of Service" - methods for using grant funds to purchase slots within existing programs, such as Head Start, which provide comprehensive services to at-risk four-year-old children.


Local plans must indicate the number of at-risk four-year-old children to be served, and the criteria by which they will be determined to be at risk.


d.1) The Department of Education and the Council on Child Day Care and Early Childhood Programs shall provide technical assistance for the administration of this grant program to provide assistance to localities in developing a comprehensive, coordinated, quality preschool program for serving at-risk four-year-old children.


2) A pre-application session shall be provided by the Department and the Council on Child Day Care and Early Childhood Programs prior to the proposal deadline.  The Department shall provide interested localities with information on models for service delivery, methods of coordinating funding streams, such as funds to match federal IV-A child care dollars, to maximize funding without supplanting existing sources of funding for the provision of services to at-risk four-year-old children.  A priority for technical assistance in the design of programs shall be given to localities where the majority of the at-risk four-year-old population is currently unserved.


e. The Department of Education is authorized to expend unobligated balances in this program's adopted budget allocations for grants to qualifying school divisions for one-time expenses, other than capital, related to start-up or expansion of programs.


15. Early Reading Intervention Payments


a. An additional payment of $15,332,606 the first year and $14,972,241 $17,482,065 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to local school divisions for the purposes of providing early reading intervention services to students in grades kindergarten through 3 who demonstrate deficiencies based on their individual performance on diagnostic tests which have been approved by the Department of Education.  The Department of Education shall review the tests of any local school board which requests authority to use a test other than the state-provided test to ensure that such local test uses criteria for the early diagnosis of reading deficiencies which are similar to those criteria used in the state-provided test.  The Department of Education shall make the state-provided diagnostic test used in this program available to local school divisions.  School divisions shall report the results of the diagnostic tests to the Department of Education on an annual basis at a time to be determined by the Superintendent of Public Instruction.


b. These payments shall be based on the state's share of the cost of providing two and one-half hours of additional instruction each week for an estimated number of students in each school division at a student to teacher ratio of five to one.  The estimated number of students in each school division in each year shall be determined by multiplying the projected number of students reported in each school division's fall membership in grades kindergarten, 1, 2, and 3 by the percent of students who are determined to need services based on diagnostic tests administered in the previous year in that school division and adjusted in the following manner:


 

Year 1

Year 2

Kindergarten

100%

100%

Grade 1

100%

100%

Grade 2

100%

100%

Grade 3

100%

100%


c. These payments are available to any school division that certifies to the Department of Education that an intervention program will be offered to such students and that each student who receives an intervention will be assessed again at the end of that school year.  At the beginning of the school year, local school divisions shall partner with the parents of those third grade students in the division who demonstrate reading deficiencies, discussing with them a developed plan for remediation and retesting.  Such intervention programs, at the discretion of the local school division, may include, but not be limited to, the use of: special reading teachers; trained aides; volunteer tutors under the supervision of a certified teacher; computer-based reading tutorial programs; aides to instruct in-class groups while the teacher provides direct instruction to the students who need extra assistance; or extended instructional time in the school day or year for these students.  Localities receiving these payments are required to match these funds based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


d. In the event that a school division does not use the diagnostic test provided by the Department of Education in the year that serves as the basis for updating the funding formula for this program but has used it in past years, the Department of Education shall use the most recent data available for the division for the state-provided diagnostic test.


e. The results of all reading diagnostic tests and reading remediation shall be discussed with the student and the student's parent prior to the student being promoted to grade four.


f. Funds appropriated for Standards of Quality Prevention, Intervention, and Remediation, Remedial Summer School, or At-Risk Add-On may also be used to meet the requirements of this program.


16. Standards of Learning Algebra Readiness Payments


a. An additional payment of $11,173,155 the first year and $11,352,196 $11,394,145 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to local school divisions for the purposes of providing math intervention services to students in grades 6, 7, 8 and 9 who are at-risk of failing the Algebra I end-of-course test, as demonstrated by their individual performance on diagnostic tests which have been approved by the Department of Education.  The Department of Education shall review the tests to ensure that such local test uses state-provided criteria for diagnosis of math deficiencies which are similar to those criteria used in the state-provided test.  The Department of Education shall make the state-provided diagnostic test used in this program available to local school divisions.  School divisions shall report the results of the diagnostic tests to the Department of Education on an annual basis at a time to be determined by the Superintendent of Public Instruction.


b. These payments shall be based on the state's share of the cost of providing two and one-half hours of additional instruction each week for an estimated number of students in each school division at a student to teacher ratio of ten to one.  The estimate number of students in each school division shall be determined by multiplying the projected number of students reported in each school division's fall membership by the percent of students that qualify for the federal Free Lunch Program.


c. These payments are available to any school division that certifies to the Department of Education that an intervention program will be offered to such students and that each student who receives an intervention will be assessed again at the end of that school year.  Localities receiving these payments are required to match these funds based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


17. School Construction Grants Program Escrow


Notwithstanding the requirements of Section 22.1-175.5 of the Code of Virginia, school divisions are permitted to withdraw funds from local escrow accounts established pursuant to Section 22.1-175.5 to pay for recurring operational expenses incurred by the school division. Localities are not required to provide a local match of the withdrawn funds.


18. English as a Second Language Payments


A payment of $44,675,649 the first year and $45,863,224 $45,258,661 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to local school divisions to support the state share of 17 professional instructional positions per 1,000 students for whom English is a second language.  Local school divisions shall provide a local match based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


19. Special Education Instruction Payments


a. The Department of Education shall establish rates for all elements of Special Education Instruction Payments.


b. Out of the appropriations in this Item, the Department of Education shall make available, subject to implementation by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, an amount estimated at $72,429,258 the first year and $77,703,941 $77,774,168 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund for the purpose of the state's share of the tuition rates for approved public school regional programs. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, the state's share of the tuition rates shall be based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


c. Out of the amounts for Financial Assistance for Categorical Programs, $32,971,928 the first year and $35,154,773 $32,906,570 the second year from the general fund is appropriated to permit the Department of Education to enter into agreements with selected local school boards for the provision of educational services to children residing in certain hospitals, clinics, and detention homes by employees of the local school boards.  The portion of these funds provided for educational services to children residing in local or regional detention homes shall only be determined on the basis of children detained in such facilities through a court order issued by a court of the Commonwealth.  The selection and employment of instructional and administrative personnel under such agreements will be the responsibility of the local school board in accordance with procedures as prescribed by the local school board.  State payments for the first year to the local school boards operating these programs will be based on certified expenditures from the fourth quarter of FY 2012 and the first three quarters of FY 2013.  State payments for the second year to the local school boards operating these programs will be based on certified expenditures from the fourth quarter of FY 2013 and the first three quarters of FY 2014. 


20. Vocational Education Instruction Payments


a. It is the intention of the General Assembly that the Department of Education explore initiatives that will encourage greater cooperation between jurisdictions and the Virginia Community College System in meeting the needs of public school systems.


b. This appropriation includes $1,800,000 the first year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund and $1,800,000 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund for secondary vocational-technical equipment.  A base allocation of $2,000 each year shall be available for all divisions, with the remainder of the funding distributed on the basis of student enrollment in secondary vocational-technical courses.  State funds received for secondary vocational-technical equipment must be used to supplement, not supplant, any funds currently provided for secondary vocational-technical equipment within the locality.  Local school divisions are not required to provide a local match in order to receive these state funds.


21. Adult Education Payments


State funds shall be used to reimburse general adult education programs on a fixed cost per pupil or cost per class basis.  No state funds shall be used to support vocational noncredit courses.


22. General Education Payments


a. This appropriation includes $2,485,988 the first year and $2,410,988 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund to support Race to GED.  Out of this appropriation, $465,375 the first year and $465,375 the second year shall be used for PluggedIn VA. 


b. This appropriation includes $2,774,478 the first year from the general fund and $2,774,478 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund to support Project Graduation and any associated administrative and contractual service expenditures related to this initiative.


23. Virtual Virginia Payments


a. From appropriations in this Item, the Department of Education shall provide assistance for the Virtual Virginia program.


b. The local share of costs associated with the operation of the Virtual Virginia program shall be computed using the composite index of local ability-to-pay.


24. Individual Student Alternative Education Program (ISAEP) Payments


Out of this appropriation, $2,247,581 the first year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund and $2,247,581 in the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund shall be provided for the secondary schools' Individual Student Alternative Education Program (ISAEP), pursuant to Chapter 488 and Chapter 552 of the 1999 Session of the General Assembly.


25. Foster Children Education Payments


a. An additional state payment is provided from the Lottery Proceeds Fund for the prior year's local operations costs, as determined by the Department of Education, for each pupil of school age as defined in § 22.1-1, Code of Virginia, not a resident of the school division providing his education (a) who has been placed in foster care or other custodial care within the geographical boundaries of such school division by a Virginia agency, whether state or local, which is authorized under the laws of this Commonwealth to place children; (b) who has been placed in an orphanage or children's home which exercises legal guardianship rights; or (c) who is a resident of Virginia and has been placed, not solely for school purposes, in a child-caring institution or group home.


b. This appropriation provides $9,016,406 the first year and $9,413,338 $8,962,411 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund to support children attending public school who have been placed in foster care or other such custodial care across jurisdictional lines, as provided by subsections A and B of § 22.1-101.1, Code of Virginia.  To the extent these funds are not adequate to cover the full costs specified therein, the Department is authorized to expend unobligated balances in this Item for this support.


26. Sales Tax Payments


a. This is a sum-sufficient appropriation for distribution to counties, cities and towns a portion of net revenue from the state sales and use tax, in support of the Standards of Quality (Title 22.1, Chapter 13.2, Code of Virginia) (See the Attorney General's opinion of August 3, 1982).


b. Certification of payments and distribution of this appropriation shall be made by the State Comptroller.


c. The distribution of state sales tax funds shall be made in equal bimonthly payments at the middle and end of each month.


27. Adult Literacy Payments


a. Appropriations in this Item include $125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year from the general fund for the ongoing literacy programs conducted by Mountain Empire Community College. 


b. Out of this appropriation, the Department of Education shall provide $100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year from the general fund for the Virginia Literacy Foundation grants to support programs for adult literacy including those delivered by community-based organizations and school divisions providing services for adults with 0-9th grade reading skills.


28. Governor's School Payments


a. Out of the amounts for Governor's School Payments, the Department of Education shall provide assistance for the state share of the incremental cost of regular school year Governor's Schools based on each participating locality's composite index of local ability-to-pay. Participating school divisions must certify that no tuition is assessed to students for participation in this program.


b. Out of the amounts for Governor's School Payments, the Department of Education shall provide assistance for the state share of the incremental cost of summer residential Governor's Schools and Foreign Language Academies to be based on the greater of the state's share of the composite index of local ability-to-pay or 50 percent.  Participating school divisions must certify that no tuition is assessed to students for participation in this program if they are enrolled in a public school.


c. For the Summer Governor's Schools and Foreign Language Academies programs, the Superintendent of Public Instruction is authorized to adjust the tuition rates, types of programs offered, length of programs, and the number of students enrolled in order to maintain costs within the available state and local funds for these programs.


d. It shall be the policy of the Commonwealth that state general fund appropriations not be used for capital outlay, structural improvements, renovations, or fixed equipment costs associated with initiation of existing or proposed Governor's schools.  State general fund appropriations may be used for the purchase of instructional equipment for such schools, subject to certification by the Superintendent of Public Instruction that at least an equal amount of funds has been committed by participating school divisions to such purchases.


e. The Board of Education shall not take any action that would increase the state's share of costs associated with the Governor's Schools as set forth in this Item.  This provision shall not prohibit the Department of Education from submitting requests for the increased costs of existing programs resulting from updates to student enrollment for school divisions currently participating in existing programs or for school divisions that begin participation in existing programs.


f.1) Regular school year Governor's Schools are funded through this Item based on the state's share of the incremental per pupil cost for providing such programs for each student attending a Governor's School up to a cap of 1,650 students per Governor's School in the first year and a cap of 1,725 students per Governor's School in the second year.  This incremental per pupil payment shall be adjusted for the composite index of the school division that counts such students attending an academic year Governor's School in their March 31 Average Daily Membership.  It is the intent of the General Assembly that this incremental per pupil amount be in addition to the basic aid per pupil funding provided to the affected school division for such students.  Therefore, local school divisions are encouraged to provide the appropriate portion of the basic aid per pupil funding to the Governor's Schools for students attending these programs, adjusted for costs incurred by the school division for transportation, administration, and any portion of the day that the student does not attend a Governor's School.


2) Students attending a revolving Academic Year Governor's School program for only one semester shall be counted as 0.50 of a full-time equivalent student and will be funded for only fifty percent of the full-year funded per pupil amount.  Funding for students attending a revolving Academic Year program will be adjusted based upon actual September 30th and January 30th enrollment each fiscal year.  For purposes of this Item, revolving programs shall mean Academic Year Governor's School programs that admit students on a semester basis.


3) Students attending a continuous, non-revolving Academic Year Governor's School program shall be counted as a full-time equivalent student and will be funded for the full-year funded per pupil amount.  Funding for students attending a continuous, non-revolving Academic Year Governor's School program will be adjusted based upon actual September 30th student enrollment each fiscal year.  For purposes of this Item, continuous, non-revolving programs shall mean Academic Year Governor's School programs that only admit students at the beginning of the school year.  Fairfax County Public Schools shall not reduce local per pupil funding for the Thomas Jefferson Governor's School below the amounts appropriated for the 2003-2004 school year.


g. All regional Governor's Schools are encouraged to provide full-day grades 9 through 12 programs.  Out of the amounts in this item, $100,000 the first year from the general fund is provided for existing Governor's Schools, as distributed by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, to plan for or study the feasibility of expanding, including via a merger with another Governor's School.  Up to $100,000 the second year is provided as one-time start-up funding for such expansions.


h. Out of the amounts in this item, $100,000 the first year from the general fund is available towards planning for a full-day grades 9 through 12 regional science and technology Governor's School in the greater Hampton Roads area.


29. School Nutrition Payments


It is provided that, subject to implementation by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, no disbursement shall be made out of the appropriation for school nutrition to any locality in which the schools permit the sale of competitive foods in food service facilities or areas during the time of service of food funded pursuant to this Item.


30. School Breakfast Payments


a. Out of this appropriation, $3,693,543 the first year and $3,837,586 $3,612,556 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund is included for the purpose of establishing a state funded incentive program to maximize federal school nutrition revenues and increase student participation in the school breakfast program.  These funds are available to any school division as a reimbursement for breakfast meals served that are in excess of the baseline established by the Department of Education.  The per meal reimbursement shall be $0.22; however, the department is authorized, but not required  to reduce this amount proportionately in the event that the actual number of meals to be reimbursed exceeds the number on which this appropriation is based so that this appropriation is not exceeded.


b. In order to receive these funds, school divisions must certify that these funds will be used to supplement existing funds provided by the local governing body and that local funds derived from sources that are not generated by the school nutrition programs have not been reduced or eliminated.  The funds shall be used to improve student participation in the school breakfast program.  These efforts may include, but are not limited to, reducing the per meal price paid by students, reducing competitive food sales in order to improve the quality of nutritional offerings in schools, increasing access to the school breakfast program, or providing programs to increase parent and student knowledge of good nutritional practices.  In no event shall these funds be used to reduce local tax revenues below the level appropriated to school nutrition programs in the prior year.  Further, these funds must be provided to the school nutrition programs and may not be used for any other school purpose.


31. Clinical Faculty and Mentor Teacher Program Payments


This appropriation includes $1,000,000 the first year and $1,000,000 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund to be paid to local school divisions for statewide Mentor Teacher Programs to assist pre-service teachers and beginning teachers to make a successful transition into full-time teaching.  This appropriation also includes $318,750 the first year and $318,750 the second year from the general fund for Clinical Faculty programs to assist pre-service teachers and beginning teachers to make a successful transition into full-time teaching.  Such programs shall include elements which are consistent with the following:


a. An application process for localities and school/higher education partnerships that wish to participate in the programs;


b. For Clinical Faculty programs only, provisions for a local funding or institutional commitment of 50 percent, to match state grants of 50 percent;


c. Program plans which include a description of the criteria for selection of clinical faculty and mentor teachers, training, support, and compensation for clinical faculty and mentor teachers, collaboration between the school division and institutions of higher education, the clinical faculty and mentor teacher assignment process, and a process for evaluation of the programs;


d. The Department of Education shall allow flexibility to local school divisions and higher education institutions regarding compensation for clinical faculty and mentor teachers consistent with these elements of the programs; and


e. It is the intent of the General Assembly that no preference between pre-service or beginning teacher programs be construed by the language in this Item.  School divisions operating beginning teacher mentor programs shall receive equal consideration for funding.


32. Career Switcher/Alternative Licensure Payments


Appropriations in this Item include $279,983 the first year and $279,983 the second year from the general fund to provide grants to school divisions that employ mentor teachers for new teachers entering the profession through the alternative route to licensure as prescribed by the Board of Education.


33. Performance Pay Pilots


Out of this appropriation, $597,673 the first year from the general fund shall be used to provide competitive grants to school divisions to pilot models for awarding performance pay for instructional personnel in hard-to-staff schools as determined by the Department of Education, pursuant to grant proposals submitted pursuant to Item 132 C.34. Performance Pay Pilots, Chapter 890, 2011 Session.


34. Virginia Workplace Readiness Skills Assessment


Appropriations in this Item include $308,655 the first year and $308,655 the second year from the general fund to provide support grants to school divisions for standard diploma graduates.  To provide flexibility, school divisions may use the state grants for the actual assessment or for other industry certification preparation and testing.


35. Out of this appropriation, $200,000 the first year from the general fund is allocated to support the purchase of EpiPens in the public schools in the Commonwealth.


36. Additional Assistance with Retirement, Inflation, and Preschool Costs


Out of this appropriation, $55,000,000 each year the first year and $51,212,111 the second year from the general fund and $3,787,889 the second year from the Lottery Proceeds Fund as one-time allocations shall be provided to school divisions as specified below to assist with costs of inflation, payments for the increase in the retirement employer contribution rates, and any one-time costs associated with local Virginia Preschool Initiative programs.  No local match is required.


School Division

FY 2013

FY 2014

Accomack

$333,821

$331,854

Albemarle

$346,469

$347,509

Alleghany

$79,620

$80,950

Amelia

$99,474

$100,579

Amherst

$267,829

$262,835

Appomattox

$127,682

$129,076

Arlington

$440,137

$443,434

Augusta

$482,561

$485,749

Bath

$11,309

$10,709

Bedford

$396,230

$393,920

Bland

$51,189

$49,674

Botetourt

$184,575

$185,535

Brunswick

$172,639

$165,161

Buchanan

$165,528

$162,632

Buckingham

$116,568

$120,167

Campbell

$464,221

$460,210

Caroline

$241,094

$244,875

Carroll

$141,860

$142,977

Charles City

$38,416

$37,553

Charlotte

$131,264

$134,202

Chesterfield

$2,433,377

$2,461,414

Clarke

$68,477

$67,502

Craig

$38,923

$38,334

Culpeper

$353,732

$361,755

Cumberland

$102,456

$101,463

Dickenson

$110,612

$108,805

Dinwiddie

$231,651

$235,857

Essex

$70,446

$71,304

Fairfax

$4,075,421

$4,084,358

Fauquier

$352,149

$356,247

Floyd

$120,052

$120,843

Fluvanna

$172,613

$173,291

Franklin

$333,612

$332,655

Frederick

$603,305

$609,929

Giles

$148,501

$149,164

Gloucester

$299,348

$298,736

Goochland

$55,864

$56,323

Grayson

$104,025

$102,767

Greene

$152,824

$150,103

Greensville

$88,186

$85,578

Halifax

$277,003

$276,108

Hanover

$729,463

$728,615

Henrico

$2,244,737

$2,252,588

Henry

$461,258

$452,295

Highland

$12,510

$11,786

Isle of Wight

$170,874

$180,398

James City

$321,169

$332,798

King George

$174,941

$180,273

King & Queen

$42,983

$44,088

King William

$109,481

$113,655

Lancaster

$38,374

$39,462

Lee

$212,928

$212,832

Loudoun

$2,059,168

$2,141,738

Louisa

$188,751

$191,830

Lunenburg

$94,046

$97,009

Madison

$69,818

$68,736

Mathews

$38,058

$38,773

Mecklenburg

$253,904

$250,370

Middlesex

$28,483

$30,299

Montgomery

$460,246

$464,146

Nelson

$69,154

$69,859

New Kent

$104,024

$105,214

Northampton

$103,274

$103,811

Northumberland

$46,726

$46,802

Nottoway

$117,183

$117,181

Orange

$222,910

$224,514

Page

$187,900

$191,909

Patrick

$128,565

$130,139

Pittsylvania

$570,082

$567,604

Powhatan

$196,224

$197,259

Prince Edward

$130,404

$130,033

Prince George

$374,834

$378,368

Prince William

$3,867,010

$3,924,140

Pulaski

$297,708

$293,120

Rappahannock

$14,611

$14,033

Richmond

$39,627

$40,941

Roanoke

$629,707

$630,559

Rockbridge

$102,293

$102,122

Rockingham

$558,249

$561,639

Russell

$215,638

$214,436

Scott

$148,203

$152,977

Shenandoah

$316,165

$319,355

Smyth

$307,294

$303,302

Southampton

$119,910

$121,660

Spotsylvania

$1,185,839

$1,197,347

Stafford

$1,258,623

$1,271,531

Surry

$25,378

$24,345

Sussex

$93,740

$91,548

Tazewell

$227,409

$238,435

Warren

$284,035

$284,356

Washington

$337,769

$338,131

Westmoreland

$100,694

$99,648

Wise

$357,801

$358,938

Wythe

$218,460

$219,221

York

$532,993

$532,416

Alexandria

$748,551

$698,074

Bristol

$102,102

$104,202

Buena Vista

$53,168

$51,323

Charlottesville

$224,089

$222,024

Colonial Heights

$111,619

$110,181

Covington

$44,260

$44,439

Danville

$414,168

$416,652

Falls Church

$26,408

$26,631

Fredericksburg

$58,452

$52,707

Galax

$56,672

$55,574

Hampton

$1,291,315

$1,262,208

Harrisonburg

$307,595

$318,329

Hopewell

$234,149

$231,452

Lynchburg

$468,992

$466,336

Martinsville

$124,954

$123,959

Newport News

$1,613,866

$1,572,192

Norfolk

$2,089,089

$2,051,361

Norton

$7,385

$6,928

Petersburg

$324,722

$307,474

Portsmouth

$812,752

$793,661

Radford

$87,618

$86,400

Richmond City

$1,651,427

$1,598,967

Roanoke City

$563,065

$560,008

Staunton

$103,500

$103,453

Suffolk

$731,077

$762,901

Virginia Beach

$3,479,228

$3,442,748

Waynesboro

$150,816

$150,040

Williamsburg

$12,926

$13,233

Winchester

$150,492

$150,411

Fairfax City

$63,875

$62,679

Franklin City

$98,665

$92,009

Chesapeake

$2,233,936

$2,231,102

Lexington

$17,287

$17,175

Emporia

$41,875

$36,966

Salem

$134,631

$134,716

Bedford City

$45,664

$45,270

Poquoson

$75,891

$75,394

Manassas City

$344,899

$344,710

Manassas Park

$155,927

$155,981

Colonial Beach

$26,129

$28,169

West Point

$30,073

$31,240

Total

$55,000,000

$55,000,000


37. Compensation Supplements


a.1) The appropriation in this item includes $70,164,391$60,963,418 the second year from the general fund for the state share of a payment equivalent to a 2.0 percent salary incentive increase, effective August 1, 2013, for funded SOQ instructional and support positions.  Funded SOQ instructional positions shall include the teacher, guidance counselor, librarian, instructional aide, principal, and assistant principal positions funded through the SOQ staffing standards for each school division in the biennium.


2) It is the intent of the General Assembly that the instructional and support position salaries be improved in school divisions throughout the state by at least 2.0 percent in the second year.   Sufficient funds are appropriated in this act to finance, on a statewide basis, the state share of a 2.0 percent salary increase for funded SOQ instructional and support positions, effective August 1, 2013, to school divisions which certify to the Department of Education, by June 15, 2013, that salary increases of a minimum of 2.0 percent have been provided in the second year by January 1, 2014, to instructional and support personnel.  In certifying that the salary increases have been provided, school divisions may not include any salary increases that were provided in the second year solely to offset the cost of required member contributions to the Virginia Retirement System under § 51.1-144, Code of Virginia.


3) It is the intent of the General Assembly that all school divisions annually provide their employees, upon request, with a user-friendly statement of total compensation, including contract duration if less than 12 months.


b. The state funds for which the division is eligible to receive shall be matched by the local government, based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay, which shall be calculated using an effective date of January 1, 2014, as the basis for the local match requirement for both funded SOQ instructional and support positions.


c. This funding is not intended as a mandate to increase salaries.


d. This appropriation is contingent on passage of House Bill 2151/ Senate Bill 1223, which passed the 2013 Session of the General Assembly.


e. The Governor is hereby authorized to allocate a sum of up to $70,164,391$60,963,418 from this appropriation to the extent necessary to offset any downward revisions of the general fund revenue estimate prepared for fiscal years 2013 and 2014 after the enactment by the General Assembly of the 2012 Appropriation Act.  If the general fund revenue estimates prepared subsequent to the 2012 General Assembly Session do not result in downward revisions and, if within five days of the preliminary close of the fiscal year ending on June 30, 2013, the Comptroller's analysis does not determine that a revenue re-forecast is required pursuant to § 2.2-1503.3, Code of Virginia, then such appropriation shall be used in the manner stated in paragraphs C.36.a.1) and 2), C.36.b.1) and 2), C.36.c., and C.36.d.1) and 2) and 3) above.


38. Strategic Compensation Grants Initiative


a. Out of this appropriation, $7,500,000$4,497,651 the second year from the general fund is provided to support implementation of the Strategic Compensation Grants (SCG) Initiative.  This program will award competitive grants to school divisions for the design and implementation of compensation systems for teachers that provide incentives that are tailored to each participating school division's strategic goals and objectives.  School divisions may expend up to five percent of the awarded grant funds for the design and implementation of compensation systems or for the administration of the program.


b. Any locality which desires to apply for this grant program must submit a proposal to the Department of Education by July 15, 2013.  The proposal must designate the groups or types of teachers targeted for incentives in the compensation system.  Incentives may focus on all teachers where quantitative student achievement data are available or specific groups of teachers within a division or school.  These proposals may include, but are not limited to, the following incentives: 1) rewarding teachers who help students make significant academic progress; 2) rewarding teachers who seek opportunities to assist in the leadership needs of the school division, such as serving as instructional coaches or professional developers; 3) providing pay incentives for effective teachers with needed expertise who are willing to transfer to hard-to-staff or low-performing schools; 4) providing incentives for team performance in schools that achieve student learning goals; or 5) rewarding effective teachers who are assigned to teach critical shortage areas, such as mathematics and special education.


c. In order to be eligible to receive a strategic compensation grant, a school division's proposal must meet the following criteria: 1) stakeholder involvement in the development and implementation of the strategic compensation model at the school division; 2) teachers in the initiative must be evaluated using an effective evaluation system with quality measure systems, consistent with the Board of Education's evaluation standards and criteria, including a weight of 40 percent on student academic progress for the summative evaluation; 3) a significant component of the model for awarding incentives must include measureable and appropriate achievement goals for student academic progress; and 4) professional development must be an integral component of the model, including how a teacher will be supported to develop a school culture of teaching and learning, to improve instruction, and to increase student achievement.  The Department of Education may also consider the geographic distribution of school divisions and the percentage of students attending hard-to-staff schools in making the competitive grant awards.


d. In order to be eligible to receive an award from the incentive program administered by the local school division and supported by the state SCG initiative, a teacher must meet the following eligibility criteria as well as other requirements established by the school division to receive incentives: 1) the teacher must be licensed to teach in Virginia and endorsed in the subject or grade level of the assignment; 2) in the case of federal core areas, the teacher must be highly qualified; 3) the teacher must be employed under a teacher contract (substitute teachers, hourly employees, or teacher aides are not eligible for an award); 4) the teacher must be employed by the local school board and provide or support direct instruction; and 5) the teacher receiving the award must be rated as successful, which shall be defined as “proficient or above” in performance evaluation ratings.


e. Any incentive for teachers included in a compensation system developed and implemented by a local school division must meet the following criteria: 1) designate incentive payments as a range or tiers for target groups, such as differentiating between the teacher of record or teachers in support positions; 2) have a maximum payment to a teacher of $5,000 per year; 3) prorate payments for teachers who have taught for less than a full school year; and 4)  performance evaluations for participating teachers must be completed in a timeline that provides sufficient time to distribute incentive funds to teachers and submit reimbursement requests to the Department of Education no later than June 1, 2014.


39. Reading Specialists Initiative


a.  An additional payment of $1,430,868$956,068 the second year from the general fund shall be disbursed by the Department of Education to qualifying local school divisions for the purpose of providing a reading specialist for any school with a third grade that has a school-wide pass rate of less than 75 percent on the reading Standards of Learning (SOL) assessments.


b. These payments shall be based on the state's share of the cost of providing one reading specialist per qualifying school based on the 2011-2012 SOL pass rates for reading.


c. These payments are available to any school division with a qualifying school that (1) certifies to the Department of Education that the division has hired a reading specialist to provide direct services to children reading below grade level in the school to improve reading achievement and (2) applies and receives a waiver for up to two years from the Board of Education for the administration of third grade SOL assessments in science or history and social science or both for the purpose of creating additional instructional time for reading specialists to work with students reading below grade level to improve reading achievement.


d. Localities receiving these payments are required to match these funds based on the composite index of local ability-to-pay.